Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37985775›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Bidirectional light-emitting diode as a visible light source driven by alternating current.

Mikołaj Żak, Grzegorz Muziol, Marcin Siekacz, Artem Bercha, Mateusz Hajdel, Krzesimir Nowakowski-Szkudlarek, Artur Lachowski, Mikołaj Chlipała, Paweł Wolny, Henryk Turski and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mikołaj ŻakInstitute of High Pressure Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Sokołowska 29/37, 01-142, Warsaw, Poland. mzak@unipress.waw.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4370-9290
Grzegorz MuziolInstitute of High Pressure Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Sokołowska 29/37, 01-142, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7430-3838
Marcin SiekaczInstitute of High Pressure Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Sokołowska 29/37, 01-142, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2359-8813
Artem BerchaInstitute of High Pressure Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Sokołowska 29/37, 01-142, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7916-2744
Mateusz HajdelInstitute of High Pressure Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Sokołowska 29/37, 01-142, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9732-6119
Krzesimir Nowakowski-SzkudlarekInstitute of High Pressure Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Sokołowska 29/37, 01-142, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8174-1518
Artur LachowskiInstitute of High Pressure Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Sokołowska 29/37, 01-142, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3633-5027
Mikołaj ChlipałaInstitute of High Pressure Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Sokołowska 29/37, 01-142, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9922-0174
Paweł WolnyInstitute of High Pressure Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Sokołowska 29/37, 01-142, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6863-338X
Henryk TurskiInstitute of High Pressure Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Sokołowska 29/37, 01-142, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2686-9842
Czesław SkierbiszewskiInstitute of High Pressure Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Sokołowska 29/37, 01-142, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-4607

Funding

Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej (Foundation for Polish Science) POIR.04.04.00-00-5D5B/18-00Ministry of Science and Higher Education | Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju (National Centre for Research and Development) LIDER/29/0185/L-7/15/NCBR/2016Ministry of Science and Higher Education | Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju (National Centre for Research and Development) LIDER/35/0127/L-9/17/NCBR/2018Narodowe Centrum Nauki (National Science Centre) 2019/35/D/ST3/03008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gallium nitride-based light-emitting diodes have revolutionized the lighting market by becoming the most energy-efficient light sources. However, the power grid, in example electricity delivery system, is built based on alternating current, which raises problems for directly driving light emitting diodes that require direct current to operate effectively. In this paper, we demonstrate a proof-of-concept device that addresses this fundamental issue - a gallium nitride-based bidirectional light-emitting diode. Its structure is symmetrical with respect to the active region, which, depending on the positive or negative bias, allows for the injection of either electrons or holes from each side. It is composed of two tunnel junctions that surround the active region. In this work, the optical and electrical properties of bidirectional light emitting diodes are investigated under direct and alternating current conditions. We find that the light is emitted in both directions of the supplied current, contrary to conventional light emitting diodes; hence, bidirectional light-emitting diodes can be considered a semiconductor light source powered directly with alternating current. In addition, we show that bidirectional light-emitting diodes can be stacked vertically to multiply the optical power achieved from a single device.

Identifiers

PMID37985775
PMCPMC10661849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.