ArticleScientific reports2023
Studying highly nonlinear oscillators using the non-perturbative methodology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of strong parametric excitation on cantilever beam: non-perturbative approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Inspection of stability of a general roll-damping of a ship via non-perturbative approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An innovative inspection of a cantilever beam exposed to principal parametric excitation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An innovative methodology in analyzing certain pendulum oscillators.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Novel analytical perspectives on nonlinear instabilities of viscoelastic Bingham fluids in MHD flow fields.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Different controllers for suppressing oscillations of a hybrid oscillator via non-perturbative analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the growing concentration in the field of the nonlinear oscillators (NOSs), the present study aims to use the general He's frequency formula (HFF) to examine the analytical representations for particular kinds of strong NOSs. Three real-world examples are demonstrated by a variety of engineering and scientific disciplines. The new approach is evidently simple and requires less computation than the other perturbation techniques used in this field. The new methodology that is termed as the non-perturbative methodology (NPM) refers to this innovatory strategy, which merely transforms the nonlinear ordinary differential equation (ODE) into a linear one. The method yields a new frequency that is equivalent to the linear ODE as well as a new damping term that may be produced. A thorough explanation of the NPM is offered for the reader's convenience. A numerical comparison utilizing the Mathematical Software (MS) is used to verify the theoretical results. The precise numeric and theoretical solutions exhibited excellent consistency. As is commonly recognized, when the restoration forces are in effect, all traditional perturbation procedures employ Taylor expansion to expand these forces and then reduce the complexity of the specified problem. This susceptibility no longer exists in the presence of the non-perturbative solution (NPS). Additionally, with the NPM, which was not achievable with older conventional approaches, one can scrutinize examining the problem's stability. The NPS is therefore a more reliable source when examining approximations of solutions for severe NOSs. In fact, the above two reasons create the novelty of the present approach. The NPS is also readily transferable for additional nonlinear issues, making it a useful tool in the fields of applied science and engineering, especially in the topic of the dynamical systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.