ArticleEye (London, England)2024
Longer axial length is associated with better prediction for refractive error after sutureless flanged intrascleral fixation of intraocular lens.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate refractive outcomes and associated factors after sutureless flanged intrascleral fixation of intraocular lens (SFIF-IOL).
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients who underwent SFIF-IOL at a single centre. The prediction error (PE; difference between the achieved and target refractive error) and absolute PE (APE) were analysed. Risk factors associated with refractive surprise, defined as APE > +0.5 D, were investigated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.
resultsNinety-one eyes were included. At the final follow-up, the mean PE and APE were +0.07 ± 0.88 and +0.68 ± 0.56 D, respectively. Refractive surprise was observed in 44 eyes (54.3%) and was associated with a shorter axial length (AL) [odds ratio, 0.825; 95% confidence interval, 0.688-0.991; P = 0.039]. APE showed a significant correlation with AL at the final visit (⍴ = -0.269, P = 0.010), and eyes with AL ≥ 26 mm had significantly lower APE than did those with AL of 24-26 mm (P = 0.021) and AL < 24 mm (P = 0.0059).
conclusionsThe refractive outcome after SFIF-IOL using manufacturer's A constant was favourable on average. Eyes with a longer AL were more likely to show a smaller deviation from the target refraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.