ArticleGeroScience2024
Machine learning-based morphological quantification of replicative senescence in human fibroblasts.
Article in GeroScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maximum Matching Accuracy: An Instance Segmentation Evaluation Metric Utilizing Globally Optimal Matching.ArXiv · 2026Article
- Dermal Fibroblast Senescence: The Central Hub of Skin Aging-From Intrinsic Dysfunction to Microenvironmental Remodeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Single-cell morphology encodes functional subtypes of senescence in aging human dermal fibroblasts.Science advances · 2025Article
- Current Methodologies to Assess Cellular Senescence in Cancer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although aging has been investigated extensively at the organismal and cellular level, the morphological changes that individual cells undergo along their replicative lifespan have not been precisely quantified. Here, we present the results of a readily accessible machine learning-based pipeline that uses standard fluorescence microscope and open access software to quantify the minute morphological changes that human fibroblasts undergo during their replicative lifespan in culture. Applying this pipeline in a widely used fibroblast cell line (IMR-90), we find that advanced replicative age robustly increases (+28-79%) cell surface area, perimeter, number and total length of pseudopodia, and nuclear surface area, while decreasing cell circularity, with phenotypic changes largely occurring as replicative senescence is reached. These senescence-related morphological changes are recapitulated, albeit to a variable extent, in primary dermal fibroblasts derived from human donors of different ancestry, age, and sex groups. By performing integrative analysis of single-cell morphology, our pipeline further classifies senescent-like cells and quantifies how their numbers increase with replicative senescence in IMR-90 cells and in dermal fibroblasts across all tested donors. These findings provide quantitative insights into replicative senescence, while demonstrating applicability of a readily accessible computational pipeline for high-throughput cell phenotyping in aging research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.