ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024
Identifying ADHD and subtypes through microstates analysis and complex networks.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in ADHD: a global perspective on research hotspots, trends and clinical applications.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in ADHD assessment: a comprehensive review of research progress from early screening to precise differential diagnosis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Mapping neural effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in ADHD using EEG microstates and machine learning models.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is based on the health history and on the evaluation of questionnaires to identify symptoms. This evaluation can be subjective and lengthy, especially in children. Therefore, a biomarker would be of great value to assist mental health professionals in the process of diagnosing ADHD. Event-related potential (ERP) is one of the most informative and dynamic methods of monitoring cognitive processes. Previous works suggested that specific sets of ERP-microstates are selectively affected by ADHD. This paper proposes a new methodology for the ERP-microstate analysis and identification of ADHD patients based on complex networks to model the microstate topographic maps. The analysis of global and local features of ERP-microstate networks revealed topological differences between ADHD and healthy control. The classification using a neural network with a single hidden layer resulted in an average accuracy of 99.72% in binary classification and 99.31% in the classification of ADHD subtypes. The results were compared to the power band spectral densities and the energy of wavelet coefficients. The temporal features of ERP-microstates, such as frequency of occurrence, duration, coverage, and transition probabilities, were also evaluated for comparison proposes. Overall, the selected topological features of ERP-microstate networks derived from the proposed method performed significantly better classification results. The results suggest that topological features of ERP-microstate networks are promising to identify ADHD and its subtypes with a neural network model compared to power band spectrum density, wavelet transform, and temporal features of ERP-microstates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.