Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37985548›Full record

ArticleGenes & genomics2024

Comparative transcriptome analysis of two contrasting genotypes provides new insights into the drought response mechanism in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.).

Suman Pahal, Harsha Srivastava, Swati Saxena, Kishor U Tribhuvan, Tanvi Kaila, Sandhya Sharma, Sapna Grewal, Nagendra K Singh, Kishor Gaikwad

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Suman PahalICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Harsha SrivastavaICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Swati SaxenaICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Kishor U TribhuvanICAR-Indian Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Ranchi, India.
Tanvi KailaICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Sandhya SharmaICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Sapna GrewalDepartment of Bio and Nanotechnology, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, India. sapnagrewal29@gmail.com.
Nagendra K SinghICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Kishor GaikwadICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India. kish2012@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0484-3844
National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology · INGuru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology · INICAR-Indian Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology · IN

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India. 09/752(0093)2019-EMR-I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite plant's ability to adapt and withstand challenging environments, drought poses a severe threat to their growth and development. Although pigeon pea is already quite resistant to drought, the prolonged dehydration induced by the aberrant climate poses a serious threat to their survival and productivity.

objectiveComparative physiological and transcriptome analyses of drought-tolerant (CO5) and drought-sensitive (CO1) pigeon pea genotypes subjected to drought stress were carried out in order to understand the molecular basis of drought tolerance in pigeon pea.

methodsThe transcriptomic analysis allowed us to examine how drought affects the gene expression of C. cajan. Using bioinformatics tools, the unigenes were de novo assembled, annotated, and functionally evaluated. Additionally, a homology-based sequence search against the droughtDB database was performed to identify the orthologs of the DEGs.

results1102 potential drought-responsive genes were found to be differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive genotypes. These included Abscisic acid insensitive 5 (ABI5), Nuclear transcription factor Y subunit A-7 (NF-YA7), WD40 repeat-containing protein 55 (WDR55), Anthocyanidin reductase (ANR) and Zinc-finger homeodomain protein 6 (ZF-HD6) and were highly expressed in the tolerant genotype. Further, GO analysis revealed that the most enriched classes belonged to biosynthetic and metabolic processes in the biological process category, binding and catalytic activity in the molecular function category and nucleus and protein-containing complex in the cellular component category. Results of KEGG pathway analysis revealed that the DEGs were significantly abundant in signalling pathways such as plant hormone signal transduction and MAPK signalling pathways. Consequently, in our investigation, we have identified and validated by qPCR a group of genes involved in signal reception and propagation, stress-specific TFs, and basal regulatory genes associated with drought response.

conclusionIn conclusion, our comprehensive transcriptome dataset enabled the discovery of candidate genes connected to pathways involved in pigeon pea drought response. Our research uncovered a number of unidentified genes and transcription factors that could be used to understand and improve susceptibility to drought.

Indexed as

CajanusTranscriptomeDroughtsGene Expression ProfilingGenotypeDEGsDrought stressEtcInduced genesPigeon peaRNA-SeqTFsTolerance

Identifiers

PMID37985548
OpenAlexW4388820370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.