Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37985457›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2023

Predicting gene regulatory links from single-cell RNA-seq data using graph neural networks.

Guo Mao, Zhengbin Pang, Ke Zuo, Qinglin Wang, Xiangdong Pei, Xinhai Chen, Jie Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guo MaoScience and Technology on Parallel and Distributed Processing Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, deya, 410073 Changsha, China.
Zhengbin PangScience and Technology on Parallel and Distributed Processing Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, deya, 410073 Changsha, China.
Ke ZuoScience and Technology on Parallel and Distributed Processing Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, deya, 410073 Changsha, China.
Qinglin WangScience and Technology on Parallel and Distributed Processing Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, deya, 410073 Changsha, China.
Xiangdong PeiScience and Technology on Parallel and Distributed Processing Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, deya, 410073 Changsha, China.
Xinhai ChenScience and Technology on Parallel and Distributed Processing Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, deya, 410073 Changsha, China.
Jie LiuScience and Technology on Parallel and Distributed Processing Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, deya, 410073 Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) has emerged as a powerful technique for studying gene expression patterns at the single-cell level. Inferring gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from scRNA-seq data provides insight into cellular phenotypes from the genomic level. However, the high sparsity, noise and dropout events inherent in scRNA-seq data present challenges for GRN inference. In recent years, the dramatic increase in data on experimentally validated transcription factors binding to DNA has made it possible to infer GRNs by supervised methods. In this study, we address the problem of GRN inference by framing it as a graph link prediction task. In this paper, we propose a novel framework called GNNLink, which leverages known GRNs to deduce the potential regulatory interdependencies between genes. First, we preprocess the raw scRNA-seq data. Then, we introduce a graph convolutional network-based interaction graph encoder to effectively refine gene features by capturing interdependencies between nodes in the network. Finally, the inference of GRN is obtained by performing matrix completion operation on node features. The features obtained from model training can be applied to downstream tasks such as measuring similarity and inferring causality between gene pairs. To evaluate the performance of GNNLink, we compare it with six existing GRN reconstruction methods using seven scRNA-seq datasets. These datasets encompass diverse ground truth networks, including functional interaction networks, Loss of Function/Gain of Function data, non-specific ChIP-seq data and cell-type-specific ChIP-seq data. Our experimental results demonstrate that GNNLink achieves comparable or superior performance across these datasets, showcasing its robustness and accuracy. Furthermore, we observe consistent performance across datasets of varying scales. For reproducibility, we provide the data and source code of GNNLink on our GitHub repository: https://github.com/sdesignates/GNNLink.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, RNAgene regulatory networks (GRNs)graph convolutional networkgraph neural networklink prediction

Identifiers

PMID37985457
PMCPMC10661972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.