Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37984956›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Protocol for SNOTOB study: radical prostatectomy without prostate biopsy following

Changming Wang, Qifei Dong, Xuehan Liu, Ming Ni, Qiang Xie, Jun Xiao, Tao Tao

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05587192 (Radical Prostatectomy Without Prostate Biopsy Following 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT Based on a Diagnostic Model), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05587192 naunknown statusnot on this map

Radical Prostatectomy Without Prostate Biopsy Following 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT Based on a Diagnostic Model: a Single-center, Single-arm, Open-label Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnhui Provincial HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled57ConditionsProstate CancerArms18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT based on diagnostic model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparative efficacy of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Changming Wang *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Qifei Dong *Department of Urology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xuehan LiuCore Facility Center for Medical Sciences, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Ming NiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Qiang XieDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Jun XiaoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China anhuiurology@126.com taotao_urology@ustc.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-9012-1110
Tao TaoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China anhuiurology@126.com taotao_urology@ustc.edu.cn.
University of Science and Technology of China · CNAnhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNowadays, invasive prostate biopsy is the standard diagnostic test for patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). However, it has some shortcomings such as perioperative complications, economic and psychological burden on patients, and some patients may undergo repeated prostate biopsy. In this study protocol, our aim is to provide a non-invasive diagnostic strategy we call the 'prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) combined model' for the diagnosis of PCa. If patients are diagnosed with PCa using PSMA combined model, we want to prove these patients can receive radical prostatectomy directly without prior prostate biopsies.

methodsThe SNOTOB trial adopts a prospective, single-centre, single-arm, open-label study design. The PSMA combined model consists of a diagnostic model based on what we previously reported and ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the ethics committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (No. 2022KY-142). The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and reported at academic conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05587192.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsBiopsyClinical Trials as TopicGallium RadioisotopesHumansMaleNiacinamideOligopeptidesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProspective StudiesProstatectomyGallium RadioisotopesNiacinamideOligopeptidesPSMA-1007biopsydiagnostic radiologyprostatic neoplasmsprotocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID37984956
PMCPMC10660686
OpenAlexW4388835489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.