Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37984935›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2023

Diabetes during pregnancy among Métis people in Alberta: a retrospective cohort study.

Britt Voaklander, Omolara Sanni, Jesus Serrano-Lomelin, Ashton James, Claire Cordingley, Reagan Bartel, T Eurich, Maria B Ospina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Britt VoaklanderSchool of Public Health (Voaklander, Eurich), and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Sanni, Serrano-Lomelin, Ospina), University of Alberta; Métis Nation of Alberta (James, Cordingley, Bartel), Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Public Health Sciences (Ospina), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.
Omolara SanniSchool of Public Health (Voaklander, Eurich), and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Sanni, Serrano-Lomelin, Ospina), University of Alberta; Métis Nation of Alberta (James, Cordingley, Bartel), Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Public Health Sciences (Ospina), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.
Jesus Serrano-LomelinSchool of Public Health (Voaklander, Eurich), and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Sanni, Serrano-Lomelin, Ospina), University of Alberta; Métis Nation of Alberta (James, Cordingley, Bartel), Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Public Health Sciences (Ospina), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.
Ashton JamesSchool of Public Health (Voaklander, Eurich), and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Sanni, Serrano-Lomelin, Ospina), University of Alberta; Métis Nation of Alberta (James, Cordingley, Bartel), Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Public Health Sciences (Ospina), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.
Claire CordingleySchool of Public Health (Voaklander, Eurich), and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Sanni, Serrano-Lomelin, Ospina), University of Alberta; Métis Nation of Alberta (James, Cordingley, Bartel), Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Public Health Sciences (Ospina), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.
Reagan BartelSchool of Public Health (Voaklander, Eurich), and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Sanni, Serrano-Lomelin, Ospina), University of Alberta; Métis Nation of Alberta (James, Cordingley, Bartel), Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Public Health Sciences (Ospina), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.
T EurichSchool of Public Health (Voaklander, Eurich), and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Sanni, Serrano-Lomelin, Ospina), University of Alberta; Métis Nation of Alberta (James, Cordingley, Bartel), Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Public Health Sciences (Ospina), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.
Maria B OspinaSchool of Public Health (Voaklander, Eurich), and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Sanni, Serrano-Lomelin, Ospina), University of Alberta; Métis Nation of Alberta (James, Cordingley, Bartel), Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Public Health Sciences (Ospina), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. jmb40@queensu.ca.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes in pregnancy is an important public health concern for Indigenous populations. We sought to evaluate the prevalence and outcomes of pre-existing and gestational diabetes among Métis pregnancies compared with other pregnancies in Alberta, Canada.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative health data from 2006 to 2016 and the Métis Nation of Alberta Identification Registry to compare the prevalence of pre-existing and gestational diabetes among all singleton Métis births with non-Métis births. We compared 10 maternal and neonatal outcomes using adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in multivariable analyses.

resultsThe study population included 7902 Métis and 471 886 non-Métis births. The age-standardized prevalence of pre-existing diabetes was 1.7% (95% CI 1.4%-2.1%) for Métis and 1.1% (95% CI 1.1%-1.2%) for non-Métis pregnancies. For gestational diabetes, the age-standardized prevalence was 6.3% (95% CI 5.6%-6.9%) for Métis and 5.4% (95% CI 5.3%-5.4%) for non-Métis pregnancies. After adjusting for parity, maternal weight, age, smoking during pregnancy and material and social deprivation, Métis pregnancies had 1.72 times higher prevalence of preexisting diabetes (adjusted OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.15-2.56) and 1.30 times higher prevalence of gestational diabetes (adjusted OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.08-1.57) than non-Métis pregnancies. Métis pregnancies with pre-existing diabetes had nearly 3 times the odds of developing preeclampsia (adjusted OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.27-6.90), while those with gestational diabetes had 48% higher odds of large-for-gestational-age infants (adjusted OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.00-2.19).

interpretationMétis pregnancies have an increased prevalence of pre-existing and gestational diabetes than non-Métis pregnancies and an elevated risk of some perinatal outcomes. Interventions to tackle these health inequities should address both physiologic and cultural dimensions of health, informed by Métis perspectives.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalPre-EclampsiaAlbertaFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPopulation GroupsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37984935
PMCPMC10662493
OpenAlexW4388831567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.