Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37984808›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024

Longitudinal MRI in the context of in utero surgery for open spina bifida: A descriptive study.

Nada Mufti, Michael Aertsen, Dominic Thomson, Phillippe De Vloo, Philippe Demaerel, Jan Deprest, Andrew Melbourne, Anna L David, GIFT-Surg Imaging Working Group

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nada MuftiElizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9839-8085
Michael AertsenDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Katholieke Universiteit (KU), Leuven, Belgium.
Dominic ThomsonPediatric Neurosurgery Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Phillippe De VlooDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Katholieke Universiteit (KU), Leuven, Belgium.
Philippe DemaerelDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Katholieke Universiteit (KU), Leuven, Belgium.
Jan DeprestElizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4920-945X
Andrew MelbourneSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences (BMEIS), King's College London, London, UK.
Anna L DavidElizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
GIFT-Surg Imaging Working Group
KU Leuven · BEUniversity College Hospital · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203145Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 203148/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust WT101957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFetal surgery for open spina bifida (OSB) requires comprehensive preoperative assessment using imaging for appropriate patient selection and to evaluate postoperative efficacy and complications. We explored patient access and conduct of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prenatal assessment of OSB patients eligible for fetal surgery. We compared imaging acquisition and reporting to the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology MRI performance guidelines. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe surveyed access to fetal MRI for OSB in referring fetal medicine units (FMUs) in the UK and Ireland, and two NHS England specialist commissioned fetal surgery centers (FSCs) at University College London Hospital, and University Hospitals KU Leuven Belgium. To study MRI acquisition protocols, we retrospectively analyzed fetal MRI images before and after fetal surgery for OSB.

resultsMRI for fetal OSB was accessible with appropriate specialists available to supervise, perform, and report scans. The average time to arrange a fetal MRI appointment from request was 4 ± 3 days (range, 0-10), the average scan time available was 37 ± 16 min (range, 20-80 min), with 15 ± 11 min (range, 0-30 min) extra time to repeat sequences as required. Specific MRI acquisition protocols, and MRI reporting templates were available in only 32% and 18% of units, respectively. Satisfactory T2-weighted (T2W) brain imaging acquired in three orthogonal planes was achieved preoperatively in all centers, and 6 weeks postoperatively in 96% of FSCs and 78% of referring FMUs. However, for T2W spine image acquisition referring FMUs were less able to provide three orthogonal planes presurgery (98% FSC vs. 50% FMU, p < 0.001), and 6 weeks post-surgery (100% FSC vs. 48% FMU, p < 0.001). Other standard imaging recommendations such as T1-weighted (T1W), gradient echo (GE) or echoplanar fetal brain and spine imaging in one or two orthogonal planes were more likely available in FSCs compared to FMUs pre- and post-surgery (p < 0.001).

conclusionsThere was timely access to supervised MRI for OSB fetal surgery assessment. However, the provision of images of the fetal brain and spine in sufficient orthogonal planes, which are required for determining eligibility and to determine the reversal of hindbrain herniation after fetal surgery, were less frequently acquired. Our evidence suggests the need for specific guidance in relation to fetal MRI for OSB. We propose an example guidance for MRI acquisition and reporting.

Indexed as

Spina Bifida CysticaBrainFemaleGestational AgeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPregnancyRetrospective Studiesaccessibilityfetal surgerymagnetic resonance imagingopen spina bifidaprotocolssequences

Identifiers

PMID37984808
PMCPMC10823411
OpenAlexW4388851939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.