Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37984340›Full record

ArticleGerontology2024

Monitoring Gait and Physical Activity of Elderly Frail Individuals in Free-Living Environment: A Feasibility Study.

Nunzio Camerlingo, Nina Shaafi Kabiri, Dimitrios J Psaltos, Meredith Kelly, Madisen K Wicker, Isabelle Messina, Sanford H Auerbach, Hao Zhang, Andrew Messere, Fikret Isik Karahanoglu and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gerontology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nunzio CamerlingoEarly Clinical Development, Pfizer, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Nina Shaafi KabiriChobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dimitrios J PsaltosEarly Clinical Development, Pfizer, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Meredith KellyChobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Madisen K WickerChobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Isabelle MessinaChobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sanford H AuerbachChobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hao ZhangEarly Clinical Development, Pfizer, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Andrew MessereEarly Clinical Development, Pfizer, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Fikret Isik KarahanogluEarly Clinical Development, Pfizer, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Mar SantamariaEarly Clinical Development, Pfizer, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Charmaine DemanueleEarly Clinical Development, Pfizer, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
David CaouetteEarly Clinical Development, Pfizer, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Kevin C ThomasChobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Boston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFrailty is conventionally diagnosed using clinical tests and self-reported assessments. However, digital health technologies (DHTs), such as wearable accelerometers, can capture physical activity and gait during daily life, enabling more objective assessments. In this study, we assess the feasibility of deploying DHTs in community-dwelling older individuals, and investigate the relationship between digital measurements of physical activity and gait in naturalistic environments and participants' frailty status, as measured by conventional assessments.

methodsFried Frailty Score (FFS) was used to classify fifty healthy individuals as non-frail (FFS = 0, n/female = 21/11, mean ± SD age: 71.10 ± 3.59 years), pre-frail (FFS = 1-2, n/female = 23/9, age: 73.74 ± 5.52 years), or frail (FFS = 3+, n/female = 6/6, age: 70.70 ± 6.53 years). Participants wore wrist-worn and lumbar-worn GENEActiv accelerometers (Activinsights Ltd., Kimbolton, UK) during three in-laboratory visits, and at-home for 2 weeks, to measure physical activity and gait. After this period, they completed a comfort and usability questionnaire. Compliant days at-home were defined as follows: those with ≥18 h of wear time, for the wrist-worn accelerometer, and those with ≥1 detected walking bout, for the lumbar-worn accelerometer. For each at-home measurement, a group analysis was performed using a linear regression model followed by ANOVA, to investigate the effect of frailty on physical activity and gait. Correlation between at-home digital measurements and conventional in-laboratory assessments was also investigated.

resultsParticipants were highly compliant in wearing the accelerometers, as 94% indicated willingness to wear the wrist device, and 66% the lumbar device, for at least 1 week. Time spent in sedentary activity and time spent in moderate activity as measured from the wrist device, as well as average gait speed and its 95th percentile from the lumbar device were significantly different between frailty groups. Moderate correlations between digital measurements and self-reported physical activity were found.

conclusionsThis work highlights the feasibility of deploying DHTs in studies involving older individuals. The potential of digital measurements in distinguishing frailty phenotypes, while unobtrusively collecting unbiased data, thus minimizing participants' travels to sites, will be further assessed in a follow-up study.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyFrailtyAgedExerciseFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGaitGait AnalysisGeriatric AssessmentHumansAccelerometersFried Frailty ScoreGait speedSedentary timeWearable

Identifiers

PMID37984340
PMCPMC11014463
OpenAlexW4388857087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.