Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37983748›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2022

Variability analysis of LC-MS experimental factors and their impact on machine learning.

Tobias Greisager Rehfeldt, Konrad Krawczyk, Simon Gregersen Echers, Paolo Marcatili, Pawel Palczynski, Richard Röttger, Veit Schwämmle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tobias Greisager RehfeldtDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1190-9485
Konrad KrawczykDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0697-5522
Simon Gregersen EchersDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9349-3235
Paolo MarcatiliDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2615-5695
Pawel PalczynskiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0004-1187-2020
Richard RöttgerDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4490-5947
Veit SchwämmleDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-6722

Funding

Velux Foundation 00028116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning (ML) technologies, especially deep learning (DL), have gained increasing attention in predictive mass spectrometry (MS) for enhancing the data-processing pipeline from raw data analysis to end-user predictions and rescoring. ML models need large-scale datasets for training and repurposing, which can be obtained from a range of public data repositories. However, applying ML to public MS datasets on larger scales is challenging, as they vary widely in terms of data acquisition methods, biological systems, and experimental designs.

resultsWe aim to facilitate ML efforts in MS data by conducting a systematic analysis of the potential sources of variability in public MS repositories. We also examine how these factors affect ML performance and perform a comprehensive transfer learning to evaluate the benefits of current best practice methods in the field for transfer learning.

conclusionsOur findings show significantly higher levels of homogeneity within a project than between projects, which indicates that it is important to construct datasets most closely resembling future test cases, as transferability is severely limited for unseen datasets. We also found that transfer learning, although it did increase model performance, did not increase model performance compared to a non-pretrained model.

Indexed as

Machine LearningTandem Mass SpectrometryChromatography, Liquidbioinformaticsdata miningdeep learningmachine learningmass spectrometryproteomicsstatisticstransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID37983748
PMCPMC10659119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.