Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37983278›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Patient experiences with SARS-CoV-2: Associations between patient experience of disease and coping profiles.

Kathryn W Hendrickson, Ramona O Hopkins, Danielle L Groat, Stephanie C Stokes, Fiona M Schroeder, Jorie M Butler, Eliotte L Hirshberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kathryn W HendricksonThe Oregon Clinic, Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine East, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Ramona O HopkinsDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Danielle L GroatIntermountain Health, Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Murray, Utah, United States of America.
Stephanie C StokesIntermountain Health, Strategic Research, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Fiona M SchroederIntermountain Health, Strategic Research, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Jorie M ButlerIntermountain Health, Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Murray, Utah, United States of America.
Eliotte L HirshbergIntermountain Health, Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Murray, Utah, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3838-2679

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, (SARS-CoV-2,) caused an influx of patients with acute disease characterized by a variety of symptoms termed COVID-19 disease, with some patients going on to develop post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Individual factors like sex or coping styles are associated with a person's disease experience and quality of life. Individual differences in coping styles used to manage COVID-19 related stress correlate with physical and mental health outcomes. Our study sought to understand the relationship between COVID-19 symptoms, severity of acute disease, and coping profiles.

methodsAn online survey to assess symptoms, functional status, and recovery in a large group of patients was nationally distributed online. The survey asked about symptoms, course of illness, and included the Brief-COPE and the adapted Social Relationship Inventory. We used descriptive and cluster analyses to characterize patterns of survey responses.

results976 patients were included in the analysis. The most common symptoms reported by the patients were fatigue (72%), cough (71%), body aches/joint pain (66%), headache (62%), and fever/chills (62%). 284 participants reported PACS. We described three different coping profiles: outward, inward, and dynamic copers. DISCUSSION: Fatigue, cough, and body aches/joint pains were the most frequently reported symptoms. PACS patients were sicker, more likely to have been hospitalized. Of the three coping profiles, outward copers were more likely to be admitted to the hospital and had the healthiest coping strategies. Dynamic copers activated several coping strategies both positive and negative; they were also younger and more likely to report PACS.

conclusionCough, fatigue, and body aches/joint pain are common and most important to patients with acute COVID-19, while shortness of breath defined the experience for patients with PACS. Of the three coping profiles, dynamic copers were more likely to report PACS. Additional investigations into coping profiles in general, and the experience of COVID-19 and PACS is needed.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Acute DiseaseAdaptation, PsychologicalArthralgiaCoughFatigueHeadacheHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID37983278
PMCPMC10659202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.