ArticlePloS one2023
Relationship between ocular surface temperature and 0.1% cyclosporine a in dry eye syndrome with meibomian gland dysfunction.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- The effects of rectus muscle surgery for intermittent exotropia on ocular surface temperature.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Comparison of effects of cyclosporine 0.05% and 0.1% in dry eye with Sjögren's syndrome.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Advanced and interpretable corneal staining assessment through fine grained knowledge distillation.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine the relationship between ocular surface temperature (OST) and 0.1% cyclosporine A in patients with dry eye syndrome and meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). This study retrospectively analyzed 35 eyes from 18 patients with dry eye disease (DED) and MGD, who were divided into two groups. Group 1 was treated with artificial tears, and eyelid margin scrubs without anti-inflammatory eye drops, while group 2 received the same treatment as group 1 along with 0.1% cyclosporine A. The ocular surface disease index (OSDI), tear meniscus height (TMH), noninvasive tear breakup time (NIBUT), lipid layer thickness (LLT), meibum quality score (MQS), and OST were measured at baseline and 1 month later. Nineteen and 16 eyes were included in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Both groups showed a significant decrease in OSDI and OST; however, the decrease was more significant in group 2. No other significant differences in TMH, NIBUT, and LLT were observed; however, MQS significantly differed in group 2. This study found that 0.1% CsA administration can relieve symptoms in patients with DED and MGD although there were no definite keratitis clues, such as epithelial erosion. In addition, the conjunctival temperature showed a correlation with symptom improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.