ArticleACS biomaterials science & engineering2024
Microfabrication of Gelatin Methacrylate/Hydroxyapatite Composites by Utilizing Alternate Soaking Process.
Article in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nano-Based 3D Printed Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Phototunable Gelatin-Based Hydrogels as Cell Scaffolds for Modulating Cell Adhesion on Hydrogel Surfaces.ACS applied bio materials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To construct a complex three-dimensional (3D) structure mimicking bone microstructure, hydrogel models of polymerized gelatin methacrylate (pGelMA) were fabricated by using stereolithography and modified with hydroxyapatite (HAp) via an alternate soaking process (ASP) using a solution of calcium and phosphate ions. Fabricated pGelMA line models whose widths were designed as 100, 300, and 600 μm were modified with HAp by ASP by changing the immersion time and number of cycles. After ASP, all of the line models with widths of 100, 300, and 600 μm were successfully modified with HAp, and large amounts of HAp were covered with the fabricated models by increasing both the immersion time and the number of cycles in ASP. HAp was observed near the surface of the line model with a width of 600 μm after ASP at an immersion time of 10 s, while the entire model was modified with HAp using ASPs for longer immersion times. The adhesion and spread of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on the pGelMA-HAp discs depended on the ASP conditions. Moreover, the HAp modification of 3D pyramid models without alteration of the microstructure was also conducted. This two-step fabrication method of first fabricating frameworks of hydrogel models by stereolithography and subsequently modifying the fabricated models with HAp will lead to the development of 3D cell culture systems to support bone grafts or to create biological niches, such as artificial bone marrow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.