Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37982997›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2024

Anatomy of the iliopsoas notch and its relationship with morphology of the proximal femur.

Michal Benes, Vojtech Kunc, Ondrej Nanka, David Kachlik, Vladislav Bartak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michal BenesDepartment of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Plzenska 130/221, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic. benesmichal24@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3326-2325
Vojtech KuncDepartment of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Plzenska 130/221, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3165-4977
Ondrej NankaDepartment of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Plzenska 130/221, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6300-395X
David KachlikDepartment of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Plzenska 130/221, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8150-9663
Vladislav Bartak1st Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9071-1943
Charles University · CZ

Funding

Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova 174523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDiscrepancy between the morphology of the acetabular margin and the design of hemispheric acetabular cups used in total hip arthroplasty may produce postoperative hip pain due to an iliopsoas impingement at the iliopsoas notch. This study aimed to determine the anatomical features of the iliopsoas notch in the Central European sample, and to test whether the morphology of the proximal femur affects the size of the iliopsoas notch.

methodsThe sample was composed of 40 matched pairs of dry hip bones and corresponding femora. The depth and length of the iliopsoas notch were measured and correlated with the available demographic data. The anthropometric parameters of the proximal femur were calculated using image-analysis software, and their association with the measurements of the iliopsoas notch was tested.

resultsThe iliopsoas notch was present in all specimens and featured four morphological configurations: curved (61.3%), angular (16.2%), irregular (16.2%), and straight (6.3%). Its size was found to be larger in males (P = 0.014 for depth, P < 0.001 for length). No significant difference existed between the sides. The height and age of the specimens did not correlate with the size of the iliopsoas notch. Furthermore, neither the femoral neck version, the lesser trochanteric version, nor the angle between the neck of the femur and the lesser trochanter influenced the dimensions of the iliopsoas notch.

conclusionThe iliopsoas notch is a consistent landmark of the acetabulum, although its anatomical appearance is widely variable. The iliopsoas notch arrangement cannot be predicted perioperatively based on the morphology of the proximal femur. The various shapes and sex-related differences detected in this study could be used for designing new hip implants or could be utilized during cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.

Indexed as

AcetabulumArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemurHumansLower ExtremityMaleMuscle, SkeletalAcetabulumAnterior labral sulcusIliopsoas notchPsoas UPsoas valleyTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID37982997
OpenAlexW4388827959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.