ArticleIrish journal of medical science2024
An evaluation of the effectiveness of an advanced practice physiotherapist in the emergency department setting in Ireland.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a clinical specialist physiotherapy service working in advanced practice in an emergency department setting.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Perceptions regarding the relevance of integrating an advanced practice physiotherapist into emergency department settings in Belgium: a qualitative exploratory study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- What is the role of advanced physiotherapy practice for adults in urgent care and emergency department settings? A scoping review protocol.HRB open research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne of the means of easing increased pressure on emergency care worldwide has been the development of advanced musculoskeletal physiotherapy practice in the emergency department setting. This model of care is in its infancy in Ireland.
aimsTo evaluate the effectiveness of an advanced practice physiotherapist working as a primary contact clinician in the emergency department at St. James's Hospital, Dublin.
methodsA three-month retrospective chart review was undertaken for patients assigned the advanced practice physiotherapist as their primary clinician during their emergency department attendance. Three widely accepted measures of quality in emergency medicine were used to evaluate effectiveness, namely, time from attendance to discharge, time from triage to assessment, and unplanned reattendance within seven days.
resultsA total of 129 patients were included in this study. Time from attendance to discharge was significantly less in the APP group (mean 208.5 min, standard deviation 122.4 min) than in the ED group (mean 377.1 min, standard deviation 314.7 min) (mean difference - 168.61 (95% C.I - 191.24- - 145.98)) (p < 0.001). Time from triage to assessment was significantly less in the APP group (mean 72.1 min, standard deviation 51.9 min) than in the ED group (mean 94.1 min, standard deviation 96.5 min) (mean difference - 22.08 (95% C.I - 31.28- - 12.89)) (p < 0.001). The unplanned reattendance rate was 3.9%. No adverse events were identified.
conclusionsThe findings of this study indicate that an advanced practice physiotherapist can provide a timely, effective, and safe service for patients attending the emergency department with musculoskeletal complaints in Ireland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37982978What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.