ArticleNeurosurgery2024
Reconnecting the Hand and Arm to the Brain: Efficacy of Neural Interfaces for Sensorimotor Restoration After Tetraplegia.
Article in Neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term safety and efficacy of intracortical microstimulation in humans.Science translational medicine · 2026Trial
- A methodological framework for the efficient characterization of peripheral nerve stimulation parameters.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Trial
- Biomimetic stimulation patterns drive natural artificial touch percepts using intracortical microstimulation in humans.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Trial
- Targeting grasp-related cortical areas for intracortical brain-machine interfaces.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Advancing data protections for implantable brain-computer interfaces.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Merging neural stimulation and exoskeletons to enhance sensorimotor hand functions after brain or spinal cord injury.Science advances · 2026Article
- Lipid nanoparticle-mediated Cd14 siRNA delivery ameliorates the acute inflammatory response to intracortical microelectrode implantation.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Restoring hand grasping for patients with a complete tetraplegia with selective epineural stimulation: a parsimonious thus relevant clinical approach.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Multi-omic spatially resolved analysis of the neuroinflammatory response to intracortical microelectrode arrays.Biomaterials · 2026Article
- Toward Natural Limb Function: A New Era in Prosthetic Innovation.Annals of neurology · 2025Review
- Evoking stable and precise tactile sensations via multi-electrode intracortical microstimulation of the somatosensory cortex.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Injecting information in the cortical reach-to-grasp network is effective in ventral but not dorsal nodes.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Simplified control of neuromuscular stimulation systems for restoration of reach with limb stiffness as a modifiable degree of freedom.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Bacteria invade the brain following intracortical microelectrode implantation, inducing gut-brain axis disruption and contributing to reduced microelectrode performance.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A Roadmap for Implanting Electrode Arrays to Evoke Tactile Sensations Through Intracortical Stimulation.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Predicting proprioceptive cortical anatomy and neural coding with topographic autoencoders.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Clinical Applications and Future Translation of Somatosensory Neuroprostheses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Review
- Review
- A roadmap for implanting microelectrode arrays to evoke tactile sensations through intracortical microstimulation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex is sufficient to induce perceptual biases.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesParalysis after spinal cord injury involves damage to pathways that connect neurons in the brain to peripheral nerves in the limbs. Re-establishing this communication using neural interfaces has the potential to bridge the gap and restore upper extremity function to people with high tetraplegia. We report a novel approach for restoring upper extremity function using selective peripheral nerve stimulation controlled by intracortical microelectrode recordings from sensorimotor networks, along with restoration of tactile sensation of the hand using intracortical microstimulation.
methodsA 27-year-old right-handed man with AIS-B (motor-complete, sensory-incomplete) C3-C4 tetraplegia was enrolled into the clinical trial. Six 64-channel intracortical microelectrode arrays were implanted into left hemisphere regions involved in upper extremity function, including primary motor and sensory cortices, inferior frontal gyrus, and anterior intraparietal area. Nine 16-channel extraneural peripheral nerve electrodes were implanted to allow targeted stimulation of right median, ulnar (2), radial, axillary, musculocutaneous, suprascapular, lateral pectoral, and long thoracic nerves, to produce selective muscle contractions on demand. Proof-of-concept studies were performed to demonstrate feasibility of using a brain-machine interface to read from and write to the brain for restoring motor and sensory functions of the participant's own arm and hand.
resultsMultiunit neural activity that correlated with intended motor action was successfully recorded from intracortical arrays. Microstimulation of electrodes in somatosensory cortex produced repeatable sensory percepts of individual fingers for restoration of touch sensation. Selective electrical activation of peripheral nerves produced antigravity muscle contractions, resulting in functional movements that the participant was able to command under brain control to perform virtual and actual arm and hand movements. The system was well tolerated with no operative complications.
conclusionThe combination of implanted cortical electrodes and nerve cuff electrodes has the potential to create bidirectional restoration of motor and sensory functions of the arm and hand after neurological injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.