Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37982099›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine and molecular imaging2023

Utility of

Jasim Jaleel, Syeddharvesh Nasurudeen, Anushna Sunila Babu, Priyanka Gupta, Bangkim Chandra Khangembam, Chetan Patel, Rakesh Kumar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jasim JaleelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Syeddharvesh NasurudeenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Anushna Sunila BabuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Priyanka GuptaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Bangkim Chandra KhangembamDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3746-6547
Chetan PatelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rakesh KumarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic efficacy of Methods: Data from patients who underwent lymphoscintigraphy for clinical suspicion of chylothorax or chylous ascites were retrospectively analyzed. Biochemical fluid analysis was taken as the reference standard. Pleural fluid triglyceride level > 110 mg/dL (with pleural fluid/serum ratio > 1) and a cholesterol level < 200 mg/dL (with pleural fluid/serum ratio < 1) were considered confirmatory for chylothorax. Ascitic fluid triglyceride level > 200 mg/dL with a low cholesterol level (ascites fluid/serum ratio < 1) was considered confirmatory for chylous ascites. Results: 26 patients (15 males, 57.7%) aged 9 months to 68 years were enrolled in the study. Based on the reference standard, 17 had chylothorax or chylous ascites (9 with surgical history). Lymphoscintigraphy was positive in 16 (with 1 false positive) and negative in 10 (with 2 false negatives). The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy of lymphoscintigraphy were 88.2% (63.6-98.5%), 88.9% (51.8-99.7%), 80.0% (51.6-93.8%), 93.8% (70.1-99.0%), and 88.5% (69.9-97.6%), respectively. SPECT/CT could localize sites of leaks in 61.5% (8/13) with a localization rate of 77.8% (7/9) and 25.0% (1/4) in patients with surgical and nonsurgical causes, respectively. Conclusion:

Indexed as

Chyle leakChylothoraxChylous ascitesChylous effusionLymphoscintigraphySPECT/CT

Identifiers

PMID37982099
PMCPMC10654269
OpenAlexW4384342061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.