ArticleVeterinarni medicina2023
Antimicrobial properties of
Article in Veterinarni medicina, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prospects and challenges in using engineered lactic acid bacteria in aquaculture applications.Engineering microbiology · 2026Review
- Metagenomic sequencing reveals the dynamic changes of pig gut fungal composition following the ages and identifies fungal species associated with diarrhea in piglets.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- The current studies on the mechanisms of lactic acid bacteria as probiotics in the alleviate of bovine diseases: a review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Impact of Limosilactobacillus reuteri cell-free culture supernatant on stress-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium in seawater: antioxidant, anti-infective, and anti-adhesion effects.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025Article
- Microbiota Analysis and Characterisation of the NovelMicroorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to use lactic acid bacteria isolated from piglet faeces to develop probiotics, allowing for the effective control of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.