ArticleHealth information science and systems2023
Essential proteins discovery based on dominance relationship and neighborhood similarity centrality.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Essential proteins play a vital role in development and reproduction of cells. The identification of essential proteins helps to understand the basic survival of cells. Due to time-consuming, costly and inefficient with biological experimental methods for discovering essential proteins, computational methods have gained increasing attention. In the initial stage, essential proteins are mainly identified by the centralities based on protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, which limit their identification rate due to many false positives in PPI networks. In this study, a purified PPI network is firstly introduced to reduce the impact of false positives in the PPI network. Secondly, by analyzing the similarity relationship between a protein and its neighbors in the PPI network, a new centrality called neighborhood similarity centrality (NSC) is proposed. Thirdly, based on the subcellular localization and orthologous data, the protein subcellular localization score and ortholog score are calculated, respectively. Fourthly, by analyzing a large number of methods based on multi-feature fusion, it is found that there is a special relationship among features, which is called dominance relationship, then, a novel model based on dominance relationship is proposed. Finally, NSC, subcellular localization score, and ortholog score are fused by the dominance relationship model, and a new method called NSO is proposed. In order to verify the performance of NSO, the seven representative methods (ION, NCCO, E_POC, SON, JDC, PeC, WDC) are compared on yeast datasets. The experimental results show that the NSO method has higher identification rate than other methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.