Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37981935›Full record

ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India

A survey of awareness, knowledge, attitude, and skills of telemedicine among healthcare professionals in India.

Rakesh Datta, Anubhav Singh, Prasun Mishra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rakesh DattaProfessor (ENT), Command Hospital (Central Command), Lucknow, India.
Anubhav SinghENT Specialist, Military Hospital Bhopal, India.
Prasun MishraProfessor (ENT), Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine Practice Guidelines were promulgated in India in 2020. There is little information about the awareness, knowledge, attitude and skills (AKAS) of the healthcare professionals regarding telemedicine and its practice guidelines a year after. The aim of the study was to study the awareness, knowledge, attitudes and skills of the healthcare workers of the country about telemedicine especially in the context of telemedicine practice guidelines 2020. Methods: An online survey was conducted over 12 weeks from active healthcare workers in India. A standard AKAS Questionnaire for telemedicine and other close and open ended questions were used. Results: A total of 602 active healthcare workers participated in the study. It was seen that a majority of participants had high scores for awareness, knowledge, and attitude toward telemedicine but a mere 39.53% scored high for skills related to telemedicine. A majority of the respondents had no knowledge of the existence of telemedicine practice guidelines and very few had seen or read them. A majority of the respondents were keen to attend a course or training to enhance their understanding and practice of telemedicine. Conclusion: The results of the study show that the basic awareness and background knowledge regarding telemedicine exists in the healthcare professionals in the country. The requirement is to train and educate them about the skills and provisions of the telemedicine practice guidelines 2020 to ensure optimal use of telemedicine and to avoid medico-legal issues.

Indexed as

eHealthRemote consultationTelehealthTelemedicineTelemedicine Practice Guidelines

Identifiers

PMID37981935
PMCPMC10654361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.