Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37981891›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of nutrition2024

Modelling the replacement of red and processed meat with plant-based alternatives and the estimated effect on insulin sensitivity in a cohort of Australian adults.

James P Goode, Kylie J Smith, Monique Breslin, Michelle Kilpatrick, Terence Dwyer, Alison J Venn, Costan G Magnussen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

James P GoodeMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS7000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1268-6420
Kylie J SmithMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS7000, Australia.
Monique BreslinMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS7000, Australia.
Michelle KilpatrickMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS7000, Australia.
Terence DwyerMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS7000, Australia.
Alison J VennMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS7000, Australia.
Costan G MagnussenMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS7000, Australia.
University of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary guidelines are increasingly promoting mostly plant-based diets, limits on red meat consumption, and plant-based sources of protein for health and environmental reasons. It is unclear how the resulting food substitutions associate with insulin resistance, a risk factor for type 2 diabetes. We modelled the replacement of red and processed meat with plant-based alternatives and the estimated effect on insulin sensitivity. We included 783 participants (55 % female) from the Childhood Determinants of Adult Health study, a population-based cohort of Australians. In adulthood, diet was assessed at three time points using FFQ: 2004–2006, 2009–2011 and 2017–2019. We calculated the average daily intake of each food group in standard serves. Insulin sensitivity was estimated from fasting glucose and insulin concentrations in 2017–2019 (aged 39–49 years) using homoeostasis model assessment. Replacing red meat with a combination of plant-based alternatives was associated with higher insulin sensitivity (

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Insulin ResistanceMeat ProductsMeat SubstitutesRed MeatAdultAustralasian PeopleAustraliaDietFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsCohort studiesFoodInsulin resistanceMeatSubstitution analysis

Identifiers

PMID37981891
PMCPMC10876457
OpenAlexW4388830957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.