ArticleSports health
Image Timing After COVID-19 Infection in Athletes.
Article in Sports health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has significantly impacted National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletics, with specific concerns for cardiac involvement after infection. Pericardial abnormalities have been seen in up to 39.5% of athletes after COVID-19 infection, while myocardial involvement has been reported at a lower rate of 2.7%. To date, myocardial injury has been seen in 0.6% to 0.7% of athletes when using symptom screening and imaging as clinically indicated, which increases to 2.3% to 3.0% when all athletes with COVID-19 undergo cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. PURPOSE: This study will examine whether there exists an ideal time from positive COVID-19 results to obtaining imaging to increase the likelihood of finding abnormalities. STUDY
designProspective cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
methodsNCAA athletes at West Virginia University who were found to be COVID-19 positive on routine screening were required to undergo echocardiography (ECG) and CMR. These data were reviewed by cardiology and determined to be normal or abnormal. Statistical analysis with logistic regression and descriptive statistics was performed to evaluate whether a time existed where abnormalities on imaging were most likely to be found.
resultsA total of 41 athletes were included in this study. ECG was performed earlier on average than CMR imaging, at 18.2 days versus 27.5 days. No significant difference was found in timing from COVID-19 infection diagnosis and abnormalities seen on imaging for either ECG or CMR imaging.
conclusionThe risk of cardiac involvement in athletes in the setting of COVID-19 has already been documented. This study suggests that imaging timing is independent of cardiac involvement with no correlation to specific time periods where more abnormalities may be found. However, CMR imaging showing changes at day 54 after infection suggests cardiac findings can be seen months after imaging. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cardiac imaging for athletes after contracting COVID-19 does not show a significant relationship to time of imaging. However, given the cardiac involvement seen months after diagnosis, further examination of prolonged cardiac effects must be carried out.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.