ArticleACS synthetic biology2023
Standardization of Fluorescent Reporter Assays in Synthetic Biology across the Visible Light Spectrum.
Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Experimentally Verified Mechanistic Model for Predicting Quorum Sensing-Based Switches.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Article
- Fluorescence-Based Assays to Evaluate the Functionality of Phage-Derived Regulatory Elements for Applications in Synthetic Biology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Biological Switches: Past and Future Milestones of Transcription Factor-Based Biosensors.ACS synthetic biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In synthetic biology, Fluorescent reporters are frequently used to characterize the expression levels obtained from both genetic parts such as promoters and ribosome binding sites as well as from complex genetic circuits. To this end, plate readers offer an easy and high-throughput way of characterizing both the growth and fluorescence expression levels of cell cultures. However, despite the similar mode of action used in different devices, their output is not comparable due to intrinsic differences in their setup. Additionally, the generated output is expressed using arbitrary units, limiting reliable comparison of results to measurements taken within one single experiment using one specific plate reader, hampering the transferability of data across different plate readers and laboratories. This article presents an easy and accessible calibration method for transforming the device-specific output into a standardized output expressing the amount of fluorescence per well as a known equivalent fluorophore concentration per cell for fluorescent reporters spanning the visible light spectrum. This calibration method follows a 2-fold approach determining both the estimated number of cells and the equivalent chemical fluorophore concentration per well. It will contribute to the comparison of plate reader experiments between different laboratories across the world and will therefore greatly improve the reliability and exchange of both results and genetic parts between research groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.