ArticlePediatric neurology2024
Nerve Transfer Surgery in Acute Flaccid Myelitis: Prognostic Factors, Long-Term Outcomes, Comparison With Natural History.
Article in Pediatric neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNerve transfer surgery is sometimes offered to patients with acute flaccid myelitis (AFM). The objectives of this study were to evaluate surgical efficacy, assess which clinical and neurophysiological data are valuable for preoperative planning, and report long-term outcomes.
methodsThis is a single-center, retrospective case series of patients with AFM who received nerve transfer surgery. All patients had preoperative electromyography and nerve conduction studies (EMG/NCS). Matched control muscles that did not receive nerve transfer surgery were defined in the same cohort.
resultsTen patients meeting inclusion criteria received a total of 23 nerve transfers (19 upper extremity, four lower extremity). The mean age at symptom onset was 3.8 years, surgery was 0.5 to 1.25 years after diagnosis, and mean follow-up was 2.3 years (range 1.3 to 4.5 years). Among muscles with preoperative strength Medical Research Council (MRC) grade 0, muscles receiving nerve transfers performed significantly better than those that did not (MRC grade 2.17 ± 0.42 vs 0 ± 0, respectively, P = 0.0001). Preoperative EMG/NCS predicted worse outcomes in recipient muscles with more abundant acute denervation potentials (P = 0.0098). Donor nerves found to be partially denervated performed equally well as unaffected nerves. Limited data suggested functional improvement accompanying strength recovery.
conclusionsNerve transfer surgery is an effective strategy to restore strength for patients with AFM with persistent, severe motor deficits. Postoperative outcomes in patients with complete paralysis are better than the natural history of disease. This study demonstrates the utility of preoperative clinical and electrophysiological data in guiding patient selection for nerve transfer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.