Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37980776›Full record

ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2023

Diversion of medications to treat opioid use disorder: Qualitative findings from formerly incarcerated adults in Massachusetts.

Elizabeth A Evans, Ekaterina Pivovarova, Rithika Senthilkumar, Rebecca E Rottapel, Thomas J Stopka, Claudia Santelices, Warren J Ferguson, Peter D Friedmann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. From Control to Care: Reframing Medication Access Policies Through Public Health Ethics.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth A EvansDepartment of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 312 Arnold House, 715 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01003, United States. Electronic address: eaevans@umass.edu.
Ekaterina PivovarovaDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655, United States.
Rithika SenthilkumarDepartment of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 312 Arnold House, 715 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01003, United States.
Rebecca E RottapelDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02111, United States.
Thomas J StopkaDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02111, United States.
Claudia SantelicesUrban Health Research and Practice, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Warren J FergusonDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655, United States.
Peter D FriedmannOffice of Research, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School - Baystate and Baystate Health, Springfield, MA, United States.
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USTufts University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · USNortheastern University · US

Funding

Massachusetts Justice Cooperative Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN) Research CenterUG1DA050067 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI EVANS, ELIZABETH A. · 2019 to 2023
$10.5M
Increasing Referrals to Medications for Opioid Use Disorders from Drug Treatment Courts using Organizational Linkage InterventionK23DA049953 · NIDA · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI PIVOVAROVA, EKATERINA · 2020 to 2022
$612k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA049953NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA050067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarceral officials often cite diversion of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) (e.g., buprenorphine) as a reason for not offering MOUD treatment in jails and prisons with little understanding of patient perspectives. We aimed to understand patient perceptions of medication diversion from jail-based MOUD programs and the factors that contribute to and reduce diversion.

methodsWe conducted thematic analyses of semi-structured interviews held in 2021-22 with 38 adults who received MOUD treatment and were released from eight Massachusetts jails that had implemented a MOUD program on or after September 2019.

resultsConsistent with prior reports from carceral staff, patients perceived MOUD diversion to happen less frequently than expected, which they attributed to dosing protocols that have effectively reduced it. Patients reported that MOUD availability reduced the contraband buprenorphine market, although other contraband substances have entered jails (fentanyl, oxycodone, K2). Patients perceived Subutex to have greater misuse potential and added diversion risks. Patients valued graduated consequences and other efforts to reduce MOUD diversion and contraband for making jails safer and for enabling patients to receive treatment. Nearly all participants reported having heard about, witnessed, or been involved in actual or attempted diversion, with variation in reports by jail. Patients suggested that dispensing MOUD to all who need it immediately upon intake would be the most effective way to reduce MOUD diversion and contraband.

conclusionFormerly incarcerated patients perceived MOUD diversion within jail medication programs as occurring less often than expected and that it can be reduced with appropriate protocols. To help limit medication diversion, patients recommended provision of MOUD upon intake to all individuals with opioid use disorder who need it. Findings have implications for MOUD program adaptation, successful routinization, and diffusion in carceral settings.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersPrisonersAdultHumansMassachusettsOpiate Substitution TreatmentPrisonsBuprenorphineBuprenorphineCarceral settingsMassachusetts Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (MassJCOIN)Medication diversionMedications for opioid use disorder (MOUD)Qualitative design

Identifiers

PMID37980776
PMCPMC10841635
OpenAlexW4388782326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.