ArticleGynecologic oncology2023
Oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of apparent early-stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus.
Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term survival outcomes of robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopy for the treatment of stage I endometrial cancer: a National Cancer Database analysis.Gynecologic oncology · 2026Article
- Comparative outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic techniques in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2025Review
- Impact of Body Mass Index on Robotic Surgery Outcomes in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Comparison of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery with sentinel lymph node navigation in low-risk endometrial cancer: a retrospective analysis.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2025Article
- Implementation of Robotic-Assisted Surgery for the Treatment of Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma.Cancers · 2025Article
- Real Life Evolution of Surgical Approaches in the Management of Endometrial Cancer in Poland.Cancers · 2025Article
- Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopy for Endometrial Cancer Staging: A Comparative Two-Center Study.Cancer management and research · 2025Article
- Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Clinically Uterine-Confined High-Grade Adenocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Review
- Ensuring Adequate Traction and Avoiding Uterine Manipulator Use During Robotic Hysterectomy for Uterine Cancer Surgery.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with clinically uterine-confined endometrioid endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging with robot-assisted (RA) versus conventional laparoscopy.
methodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of patients with newly diagnosed, uterine-confined endometrioid endometrial cancer who were treated and had primary surgery at our institution between 1/1/2009-1/1/2018. Clinicopathologic, surgical, and survival data were collected. Appropriate statistical methods were applied.
resultsOf 1728 patients identified, 1389 (80.4%) underwent RA and 339 (19.6%) conventional laparoscopy. At diagnosis, median age was 60 years (range, 24-92) and median BMI was 30.2 kg/m
conclusionIn uterine-confined endometrioid endometrial cancers, surgical staging using RA laparoscopy was not associated with adverse survival outcomes compared to conventional laparoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.