ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2023
BBB-PEP-prediction: improved computational model for identification of blood-brain barrier peptides using blending position relative composition specific features and ensemble modeling.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- PepPharmaHub: a cloud-based platform integrating multimodel language architectures with curated data resources for therapeutic peptide discovery.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Systematic benchmarking of 13 AI methods for predicting cyclic peptide membrane permeability.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Computational Modeling of Pharmaceuticals with an Emphasis on Crossing the Blood-Brain Barrier.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- ESM-BBB-Pred: a fine-tuned ESM 2.0 and deep neural networks for the identification of blood-brain barrier peptides.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- TNFR-LSTM: A Deep Intelligent Model for Identification of Tumour Necroses Factor Receptor (TNFR) Activity.IET systems biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BBPs have the potential to facilitate the delivery of drugs to the brain, opening up new avenues for the development of treatments targeting diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). The obstacle faced in central nervous system disorders stems from the formidable task of traversing the blood-brain barrier (BBB) for pharmaceutical agents. Nearly 98% of small molecule-based drugs and nearly 100% of large molecule-based drugs encounter difficulties in successfully penetrating the BBB. This importance leads to identification of these peptides, can help in healthcare systems. In this study, we proposed an improved intelligent computational model BBB-PEP-Prediction for identification of BBB peptides. Position and statistical moments based features have been computed for acquired benchmark dataset. Four types of ensembles such as bagging, boosting, stacking and blending have been utilized in the methodology section. Bagging employed Random Forest (RF) and Extra Trees (ET), Boosting utilizes XGBoost (XGB) and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM). Stacking uses ET and XGB as base learners, blending exploited LGBM and RF as base learners, while Logistic Regression (LR) has been applied as Meta learner for stacking and blending. Three classifiers such as LGBM, XGB and ET have been optimized by using Randomized search CV. Four types of testing such as self-consistency, independent set, cross-validation with 5 and 10 folds and jackknife test have been employed. Evaluation metrics such as Accuracy (ACC), Specificity (SPE), Sensitivity (SEN), Mathew's correlation coefficient (MCC) have been utilized. The stacking of classifiers has shown best results in almost each testing. The stacking results for independent set testing exhibits accuracy, specificity, sensitivity and MCC score of 0.824, 0.911, 0.831 and 0.663 respectively. The proposed model BBB-PEP-Prediction shown superlative performance as compared to previous benchmark studies. The proposed system helps in future research and research community for in-silico identification of BBB peptides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.