Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37980527›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

Kirschner wire versus external fixation in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in older children and adolescents: a comparative study.

Yu Wang, Qian Wang, Wuyi Yao, Jingxin Zhao, Xiaobin Zhao, Man He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu Wang *Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, 067000, PR China.
Qian Wang *Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, 067000, PR China.
Wuyi YaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, 067000, PR China.
Jingxin ZhaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, 067000, PR China.
Xiaobin ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, 36 Nanyingzi Street, Chengde, Shuangqiao District, Hebei, 067000, PR China.
Man HeDepartment of Rehabilitation, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, 067000, PR China. w741366430@126.com.
Chengde Medical University · CN

Funding

Medical Science Research Project of Hebei Province 20231389S&T Program of Chengde 202109A075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic effects of Kirschner wire fixation and external fixation in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in older children and adolescents.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of older children and adolescents who underwent surgery at our institution for proximal humeral fractures between April 2014 and May 2022. One group (n = 28) underwent fracture reduction and Kirschner wire fixation, and the other group (n = 23) underwent external fixation. During the follow-up, the differences in shoulder joint function between the two groups were compared by analysing Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) and Constant-Murley scores. Postoperative complications were also recorded.

resultsThe operation time of the Kirschner wire group was shorter than that of the external fixation group (69.07 ± 11.34 min vs. 77.39 ± 15.74 min, P = 0.33). The time to remove the fixator in the external fixation group was shorter than that in the Kirschner wire group (6.74 ± 1.57 vs. 7.61 ± 1.22, P = 0.032). The Quick DASH score and Constant-Murley score of the patients in the external fixation group were significantly better than those in the Kirschner wire group at 3 months after surgery (5.63 ± 4.33 vs. 8.93 ± 6.40, P = 0.040; 93.78 ± 2.43 vs. 91.75 ± 2.15, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in the Quick DASH score or Constant-Murley score between the patients in the external fixator group and those in the Kirschner wire group at 9 months after the operation (2.77 ± 3.14 vs. 3.17 ± 3.68, P = 0.683; 97.39 ± 1.80 vs. 96.57 ± 2.15, P = 0.152). The most common complication of the two groups was pin tract infection. The incidence rate of infection was higher in the external fixation group than that in the Kirschner wire group (9 vs. 4, P = 0.043).

conclusionBoth Kirschner wire fixation and external fixation of N-H III and IV proximal humeral fractures in older children and adolescents produce good outcomes. External fixation is a preferred surgical treatment option for paediatric proximal humerus fractures because early mobilization of the affected limb can be realized.

Indexed as

Humeral FracturesShoulder FracturesAdolescentBone WiresChildExternal FixatorsFracture FixationFracture Fixation, InternalHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdolescentExternal fixationKirschner wireOlder childrenProximal humeral fracture

Identifiers

PMID37980527
PMCPMC10656960
OpenAlexW4388797420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.