Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37980523›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2023

Health Equity Impact Assessment (HEIA) reporting tool: developing a checklist for policymakers.

Alireza Olyaeemanesh, Amirhossein Takian, Hakimeh Mostafavi, Mohammadreza Mobinizadeh, Ahad Bakhtiari, Fateme Yaftian, Abbass Vosoogh-Moghaddam, Efat Mohamadi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Global burden and cross-country inequalities of alcoholic cardiomyopathy: A 1990-2021 analysis.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Implementing Patient Navigation for Children With CKD.Kidney international reports · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Health equity checklist for research.Ethics, medicine, and public health · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alireza OlyaeemaneshHealth Equity Research Center (HERC), TehranUniversity of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Amirhossein TakianHealth Equity Research Center (HERC), TehranUniversity of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Hakimeh MostafaviHealth Equity Research Center (HERC), TehranUniversity of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Mohammadreza MobinizadehNational Institute for Health Research, TehranUniversity of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Ahad BakhtiariHealth Equity Research Center (HERC), TehranUniversity of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Fateme YaftianHealth Equity Research Center (HERC), TehranUniversity of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Abbass Vosoogh-MoghaddamGovernance and Health Training and Research Department, National Institute for Health Research, TehranUniversity of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Efat MohamadiHealth Equity Research Center (HERC), TehranUniversity of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran. e-mohamadi@sina.tums.ac.ir.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth Equity Impact Assessment (HEIA) is a decision support tool that shows users how a new program, policy, or innovation affects health equity in different population groups. Various HEIA reporting and dissemination tools are available, nevertheless, a practical standard tool to present the results of HEIA in an appropriate period to policymakers is lacking. This work reports the development of a tool (a checklist) for HEIA reporting at the decision-making level, aiming to promote the application of HEIA evidence for improving health equity.

methodsThis is a mixed-method study that was carried out over four stages in 2022-2023: 1) identifying HEIA models, checklists, and reporting instruments; 2) development of the initial HEIA reporting checklist; 3) checklist validation; and 4) piloting the checklist. We also analyzed the Face, CVR, and CVI validity of the tool.

resultsWe developed the initial checklist through analysis of 53 included studies and the opinions of experts. The final checklist comprised five sections: policy introduction (eight subsections), managing the HEIA of policy (seven subsections), scope of the affected population (three subsections), HEIA results (seven subsections), and recommendations (three subsections).

conclusionNeeds assessment, monitoring during implementation, health impact assessment, and other tools such as monitoring outcome reports, appraisals, and checklists are all methods for assessing health equity impact. Other equity-focused indicators, such as the equity lens and equity appraisal, may have slightly different goals than the HEIA. Similarly, the formats for presenting and publishing HEIA reports might vary, depending on the target population and the importance of the report.

Indexed as

ChecklistHealth EquityHealth Impact AssessmentHumansPolicyPublishingHealth EquityHealth Equity Impact Assessment (HEIA)Health Impact Assessment (HIA)Health PolicyInequality in health

Identifiers

PMID37980523
PMCPMC10657117
OpenAlexW4388797791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.