ArticleTrials2023
Comparing acute normovolumic hemodilution with autologous platelet-rich plasma for blood preservation during aortic surgery : study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBoth acute normovolumic hemodilution (ANH) and autologous platelet-rich plasma (aPRP) have been demonstrated blood-protective effects in cardiac aortic surgery; however, the efficacies of the two methods have not been compared. This study aims to compare the effects of aPRP and ANH prior to aortic surgery on postoperative bleed and other outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, single-center, double-blind controlled clinical trial including 160 patients randomized 1:1 to receive aPRP (test group) or autologous whole blood (ANH, control group). The primary objective is to compare the drainage volumes in the two groups at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include input of allogeneic blood and blood products and durations of aortic block, extracorporeal circulation, deep hypothermic arrest of circulation, tracheal extubation, hospital stay, requirement for secondary surgical hemostasis, and application of intra-aortic balloon pump or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the two groups. In addition, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, central venous pressure, and thromboelastography recorded before blood reservation (T1), after blood reservation (T2), before blood transfusion (T3), and after the blood is returned (T4) to the transfusion will be compared between the two groups of patients. DISCUSSION: This study will demonstrate if the use of aPRP could reduce the risk of bleeding after aortic surgery compared with ANH. The results are expected to have practical clinical applications in terms of more effective blood protection and shorter hospital stay.
trial registrationThis study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/ ) with the ID ChiCTR 1900023351.Registered on May 23, 2019. TRIAL STATUS: Recruiting start date: July 1, 2019; expected recruiting end date: July 1, 2024 Version number and date: Version 2 of 05-04-2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.