ArticleBMC surgery2023
Calcium phosphate cement promotes the stability of osteoporotic lumbar pedicle screw by enhancer-injecters with different number of holes.
Article in BMC surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bone cement-augmented vs. conventional pedicle screws for osteoporotic lumbar spondylolisthesis: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundsThis study aimed to compare whether Calcium phosphate cement (CPC) promotes the stability of osteoporotic lumbar pedicle screw by enhancer-injecters with different number of holes.
methodsThrough a self-designed bone cement injection device, the pedicle screw canal was strengthened with calcium phosphate bone cement, and divided into 4-hole group, 6-hole group, 8-hole group, straight pore group and the control group. The screw was inserted into the mechanical test module, the Maximum insertion torque and Maximum axial pull-out strength were recorded, and the distribution of calcium phosphate bone cement was analyzed by CT and X-ray. The data results were analyzed using SPSS19.0 statistical software package.
resultsThe distribution of bone cement in different reinforcement groups was different and showed regularity. The bone cement in the 4-hole group was roughly located in the head 1/3 of the screw, the 6-hole group was located in the middle 1/3 of the screw, and the 8-hole group was located in the caudal 1/3 of the screw. Compared with the control group, the maximum axial pull-out force of screws in the lateral hole and full screw tunnel reinforcement group was significantly increased. There was no significant difference between the 4-hole, 6-hole and straight pore groups. There was no difference in the screw-in torque between the reinforcement groups, and they all increased significantly compared with the control group, and the difference was statistically significant. After the screw was pulled out, the interface between the bone cement and the polyurethane material was fractured, and a tight package was formed with the screw.
conclusionsEnhancer syringes with different hole numbers combined with CPC bone cement injection can significantly increase the maximum screw pull-out force. The 8-hole group has a smaller pull-out force and is relatively prone to leakage of reinforcing material, which lacks safety in use. The local reinforcement of 4-hole and 6-hole sheath can play a similar role to that of total nail tunnel reinforcement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.