ArticleScientific reports2023
A novel subject-wise dictionary learning approach using multi-subject fMRI spatial and temporal components.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simultaneously capturing excessive variations and smooth dynamics of the underlying neural activity using spatiotemporal basis expansion and multisubject fMRI data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Three layered sparse dictionary learning algorithm for enhancing the subject wise segregation of brain networks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The conventional dictionary learning (DL) algorithms aim to adapt the dictionary/sparse code to individual functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Thus, lacking the capability to consolidate the spatiotemporal diversities offered by other subjects. Considering that subject-wise (sw) data matrix can be decomposed into the sparse linear combination of multi-subject (MS) time courses and MS spatial maps, two new algorithms, sw sequential DL (swsDL) and sw block DL (swbDL), have been proposed. They are based on the novel framework, defined by the mixing model, where base matrices prepared by operating a computationally fast sparse spatiotemporal blind source separation method over multiple subjects are employed to adapt the mixing matrices to sw training data. They solve the optimization models formulated using [Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text]-norm penalization/constraints through dictionary/sparse code pair update and alternating minimization approach. They are unique because no existing sparse DL method can incorporate MS spatiotemporal components while updating sw atoms/sparse codes, which can eventually be assembled using neuroscience knowledge to extract group-level dynamics. Various fMRI datasets are used to evaluate and compare the performance of the proposed algorithms with existing state-of-the-art algorithms. Specifically, overall, a [Formula: see text] increase in the mean correlation value and [Formula: see text] reduction in the mean computation time exhibited by swsDL and swbDL, respectively, over the adaptive consistent sequential dictionary algorithm.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.