Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37980391›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A novel subject-wise dictionary learning approach using multi-subject fMRI spatial and temporal components.

Muhammad Usman Khalid, Malik Muhammad Nauman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muhammad Usman KhalidCollege of Computer and Information Sciences, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, 11564, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Malik Muhammad NaumanFaculty of Integrated Technologies, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan, BE1410, Brunei. malik.nauman@ubd.edu.bn.

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conventional dictionary learning (DL) algorithms aim to adapt the dictionary/sparse code to individual functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Thus, lacking the capability to consolidate the spatiotemporal diversities offered by other subjects. Considering that subject-wise (sw) data matrix can be decomposed into the sparse linear combination of multi-subject (MS) time courses and MS spatial maps, two new algorithms, sw sequential DL (swsDL) and sw block DL (swbDL), have been proposed. They are based on the novel framework, defined by the mixing model, where base matrices prepared by operating a computationally fast sparse spatiotemporal blind source separation method over multiple subjects are employed to adapt the mixing matrices to sw training data. They solve the optimization models formulated using [Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text]-norm penalization/constraints through dictionary/sparse code pair update and alternating minimization approach. They are unique because no existing sparse DL method can incorporate MS spatiotemporal components while updating sw atoms/sparse codes, which can eventually be assembled using neuroscience knowledge to extract group-level dynamics. Various fMRI datasets are used to evaluate and compare the performance of the proposed algorithms with existing state-of-the-art algorithms. Specifically, overall, a [Formula: see text] increase in the mean correlation value and [Formula: see text] reduction in the mean computation time exhibited by swsDL and swbDL, respectively, over the adaptive consistent sequential dictionary algorithm.

Identifiers

PMID37980391
PMCPMC10657419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.