Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37980386›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

CT-based comparison of porcine, ovine, and human pulmonary arterial morphometry.

Leonid Goubergrits, Marie Schafstedde, Nikola Cesarovic, Angelika Szengel, Boris Schmitt, Moritz Wiegand, Jan Romberg, Andreas Arndt, Titus Kuehne, Jan Brüning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Parameterized Cross-Sectional Model for Simulating Balloon Angioplasty in Atherosclerotic Arteries.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  3. Translation of Animal Study to Human: In Silico Based Development of Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Sensor.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Leonid GoubergritsDeutsches Herzzentrum Der Charité (DHZC), Institute of Computer-Assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Marie SchafsteddeDeutsches Herzzentrum Der Charité (DHZC), Institute of Computer-Assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Nikola CesarovicDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Angelika Szengel1000Shapes GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Boris SchmittDeutsches Herzzentrum Der Charité (DHZC), Institute of Computer-Assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Moritz WiegandDeutsches Herzzentrum Der Charité (DHZC), Institute of Computer-Assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Jan RombergBiotronik, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas ArndtBiotronik, Berlin, Germany.
Titus KuehneDeutsches Herzzentrum Der Charité (DHZC), Institute of Computer-Assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Jan BrüningDeutsches Herzzentrum Der Charité (DHZC), Institute of Computer-Assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Berlin, Germany. Jan.bruening@dhzc-charite.de.

Funding

European Commission 101017578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To facilitate pre-clinical animal and in-silico clinical trials for implantable pulmonary artery pressure sensors, understanding the respective species pulmonary arteries (PA) anatomy is important. Thus, morphological parameters describing PA of pigs and sheep, which are common animal models, were compared with humans. Retrospective computed tomography data of 41 domestic pigs (82.6 ± 18.8 kg), 14 sheep (49.1 ± 6.9 kg), and 49 patients (76.8 ± 18.2 kg) were used for reconstruction of the subject-specific PA anatomy. 3D surface geometries including main, left, and right PA as well as LPA and RPA side branches were manually reconstructed. Then, specific geometric parameters (length, diameters, taper, bifurcation angle, curvature, and cross-section enlargement) affecting device implantation and post-interventional device effect and efficacy were automatically calculated. For both animal models, significant differences to the human anatomy for most geometric parameters were found, even though the respective parameters' distributions also featured relevant overlap. Out of the two animal models, sheep seem to be better suitable for a preclinical study when considering only PA morphology. Reconstructed geometries are provided as open data for future studies. These findings support planning of preclinical studies and will help to evaluate the results of animal trials.

Indexed as

Pulmonary ArteryTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimalsHumansHypertrophyRetrospective StudiesSheepSus scrofaSwine

Identifiers

PMID37980386
PMCPMC10657407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.