ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2024
Antibiotic prescription in ambulatory care for COVID-19 patients: a cohort analysis in four European countries.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of SARS-CoV-2 Infection-Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Polish Association of Epidemiologists and Infectiologists, for 2025.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Family Doctor in the "COVID-19 Era".Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Bacterial Infections, Trends, and Resistance Patterns in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Romania-A Systematic Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Antibiotic prescriptions associated with a diagnosis of acute nasopharyngitis by general GPs in France: a retrospective study.BJGP open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyse antibiotic prescription rates in ambulatory care for COVID-19 patients by general practitioners (GPs) in four European countries.
methodsA total of 4,513,955 anonymised electronic prescribing records of 3656 GPs in four European countries were analysed. Diagnosis and prescriptions were retrieved. Antibiotic prescription rates during COVID-19 consultations were analysed and compared between France, the UK, Belgium and Romania.
resultsOverall prescription rate was in France and Belgium (6.66 and 7.46%). However, analysing median GP prescribing rates, we found that 33.9% of the GPs in Belgium prescribed antibiotics with a median of 16 prescriptions per 100 COVID-19 consultations, while 55.21% of the GPs in France prescribed a median of 8 antibiotic prescriptions per 100 COVID-19 consultations. Overall antibiotic prescription rates were less in Romania than in the UK (22% vs 32%); however, 73% of the Romanian GPs vs 57% of the British GPs prescribed antibiotics. Depending on the country, the proportion of each type of antibiotic was statistically different, with the proportion of azithromycin being more than 50% of all antibiotics in each country except for the UK where it was less than 1%.
conclusionBoth individual GPs prescribing patterns in addition to overall consumption patterns should be analysed in order to implement a tailored antimicrobial stewardship programme. Furthermore, antibiotic prescribing rates in COVID-19 are lower than other respiratory tract infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.