How Is the Dobbs Ruling Affecting U.S. Adolescents?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Severe Maternal Morbidity Among Adolescents Aged 10-19 in California, 2001-2020.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2026
   Article
2. Adolescents' and Young Adults' Receipt of Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling.JAMA network open · 2025
   Article
3. Beliefs and Behaviors Regarding Abortion Counseling Among US Clinicians Caring for Adolescents.Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology · 2025
   Article
4. Evaluation of a Pregnancy Options Counseling Curriculum for Pediatric Residents.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  A Nationwide Sample of Adolescents and Young Adults Share Where They Would Go Online for Abortion Information After Dobbs v. Jackson.2023

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as