Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37979553›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2023

Case report: Acute appendicitis in appendix duplication.

Jonathon Clymo, Alona Courtney, Emma V Carrington

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathon ClymoImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom.
Alona CourtneyDepartment of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery & Interventional Sciences, University College London, 3rd floor, Charles Bell House, 43-47 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, United Kingdom; The Princess Grace Hospital, HCA Healthcare UK, 42-52 Nottingham Place, London W1U 5NY, United Kingdom. Electronic address: alona.courtney@icloud.com.
Emma V CarringtonImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom; Imperial College London, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery & Cancer, St Mary's Campus, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBThe Princess Grace Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDuplication of the appendix is a very rare presentation. According to the Cave-Wallbridge classification, there are three types of duplicate appendix. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 43 year old female presented with classical symptoms of acute appendicitis, with unremarkable inflammatory markers. The diagnosis was confirmed on pre-operative computer tomography (CT). During laparoscopy two tubular structures were identified: one arising from the tenia libera of the caecum adjacent to the terminal ileum and one retrocaecally at the confluence of the teniae. Both structures were excised using a laparoscopic linear stapler. Histopathological analysis demonstrated the accessory structure to be a microscopically unremarkable blind-ended tubular structure. The other specimen demonstrated acute gangrenous inflammation of the appendix. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged home the following day. DISCUSSION: Appendix duplication is rare; however, failure to recognise it in a patient with acute appendicitis could result in a retained source of sepsis, requiring subsequent re-exploration of the abdomen. The case presented here represents a Type B2 according to the Cave-Wallbridge classification and is the most susceptible to inadvertent error due to having appendixes in both typical and atypical anatomical locations. This case also highlights the probability of this diagnosis being missed on pre-operative CT.

conclusionThis case report presents a unique opportunity for surgical trainees to review intra-operative laparoscopic images of a duplicate appendix, both to allow them to recognise this pathology if encountered in the future, and to embed the importance of ruling it out with thorough intra-operative examination.

Indexed as

Acute appendicitisAppendix duplicationCase reportEmergency surgeryTraining

Identifiers

PMID37979553
PMCPMC10694281
OpenAlexW4388673142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.