ArticleUltramicroscopy2024
Computational models of amorphous ice for accurate simulation of cryo-EM images of biological samples.
Article in Ultramicroscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- CryoJAX: a cryo-electron microscopy image-simulation library in JAX.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026Article
- Electron fourier ptychography for phase reconstruction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- cryoJAX: A Cryo-electron Microscopy Image Simulation Library In JAX.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Roodmus: a toolkit for benchmarking heterogeneous electron cryo-microscopy reconstructions.IUCrJ · 2024Article
- Pillar data-acquisition strategies for cryo-electron tomography of beam-sensitive biological samples.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Simulations of cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) images of biological samples can be used to produce test datasets to support the development of instrumentation, methods, and software, as well as to assess data acquisition and analysis strategies. To be useful, these simulations need to be based on physically realistic models which include large volumes of amorphous ice. The gold standard model for EM image simulation is a physical atom-based ice model produced using molecular dynamics simulations. Although practical for small sample volumes; for simulation of cryo-EM data from large sample volumes, this can be too computationally expensive. We have evaluated a Gaussian Random Field (GRF) ice model which is shown to be more computationally efficient for large sample volumes. The simulated EM images are compared with the gold standard atom-based ice model approach and shown to be directly comparable. Comparison with experimentally acquired data shows the Gaussian random field ice model produces realistic simulations. The software required has been implemented in the Parakeet software package and the underlying atomic models are available online for use by the wider community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.