Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37979209›Full record

ArticleHormones and behavior2024

Sex diversity in the 21st century: Concepts, frameworks, and approaches for the future of neuroendocrinology.

Kristina O Smiley, Kathleen M Munley, Krisha Aghi, Sara E Lipshutz, Tessa M Patton, Devaleena S Pradhan, Tessa K Solomon-Lane, Simón E D Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hormones and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Spectrum of Sex and Gender.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kristina O SmileyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 639 North Pleasant Street, Morrill IVN Neuroscience, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. Electronic address: ksmiley@umass.edu.
Kathleen M MunleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, 3695 Cullen Boulevard, Houston, TX 77204, USA. Electronic address: kmmunley@uh.edu.
Krisha AghiDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California Los Angeles, 405 Hilgard Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Electronic address: kaghi@g.ucla.edu.
Sara E LipshutzDepartment of Biology, Duke University, 130 Science Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA. Electronic address: sara.lipshutz@duke.edu.
Tessa M PattonBioinformatics Program, Loyola University Chicago, 1032 West Sheridan Road, LSB 317, Chicago, IL 60660, USA. Electronic address: tpatton4@luc.edu.
Devaleena S PradhanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, 921 South 8th Avenue, Mail Stop 8007, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA. Electronic address: devaleenapradhan@isu.edu.
Tessa K Solomon-LaneScripps, Pitzer, Claremont McKenna Colleges, 925 North Mills Avenue, Claremont, CA 91711, USA. Electronic address: tsolomonlane@kecksci.claremont.edu.
Simón E D SunCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1 Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA. Electronic address: sisun@cshl.edu.

Funding

UPLIFT: UCLA Postdocs' Longitudinal Investment in Faculty TrainingK12GM106996 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CAREY, MICHAEL F, VILLANUEVA, CLAUDIO J · 2016 to 2025
$7.1M
Hormonal regulation of sensory processing during parental careK99HD108800 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI SMILEY, KRISTINA O. · 2022 to 2023
$252k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNICHD NIH HHS K99 HD108800NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM106996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex is ubiquitous and variable throughout the animal kingdom. Historically, scientists have used reductionist methodologies that rely on a priori sex categorizations, in which two discrete sexes are inextricably linked with gamete type. However, this binarized operationalization does not adequately reflect the diversity of sex observed in nature. This is due, in part, to the fact that sex exists across many levels of biological analysis, including genetic, molecular, cellular, morphological, behavioral, and population levels. Furthermore, the biological mechanisms governing sex are embedded in complex networks that dynamically interact with other systems. To produce the most accurate and scientifically rigorous work examining sex in neuroendocrinology and to capture the full range of sex variability and diversity present in animal systems, we must critically assess the frameworks, experimental designs, and analytical methods used in our research. In this perspective piece, we first propose a new conceptual framework to guide the integrative study of sex. Then, we provide practical guidance on research approaches for studying sex-associated variables, including factors to consider in study design, selection of model organisms, experimental methodologies, and statistical analyses. We invite fellow scientists to conscientiously apply these modernized approaches to advance our biological understanding of sex and to encourage academically and socially responsible outcomes of our work. By expanding our conceptual frameworks and methodological approaches to the study of sex, we will gain insight into the unique ways that sex exists across levels of biological organization to produce the vast array of variability and diversity observed in nature.

Indexed as

NeuroendocrinologySexAnimalsAndrogensBehaviorBirdsEstrogensFishGenderMultivariableRodentsSex diversitySex variabilityStatistical modeling

Identifiers

PMID37979209
PMCPMC10842816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.