ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2024
Reliability of the safety threats and adverse events in trauma (STAT) taxonomy using trauma video review.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe STAT (Safety Threats and Adverse Events in Trauma) taxonomy was developed through expert consensus, and groups 65 identified trauma resuscitation adverse events (AEs) into nine distinct categories. It provides a framework for standardized analysis of trauma resuscitations and creates a foundation for targeted quality improvement and patient safety initiatives. This study aims to evaluate the reliability of the STAT taxonomy in identifying AEs during video-recorded trauma resuscitations.
methodsHigh-definition audiovisual data from 30 trauma resuscitations were reviewed. Videos were assessed and scored by four independent reviewers (two trainees and two staff). The STAT taxonomy was used to identify AEs based on binary responses: yes and no. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using Gwet's AC1. The frequencies of AEs were tallied and reported as counts and percentages.
resultsThe most common AEs identified in the videos were failure to measure temperature (86.7%) and inadequate personal protective equipment (86.7%), followed by inability to use closed-loop communication (76.7%). The agreement on all AEs between reviewers was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93-0.95). The Gwet's AC1 agreement across the 9 AE categories was paramedic handover (0.82), airway and breathing (0.99), circulation (0.95), assessment of injuries (0.91), management of injuries (0.96), procedure-related (0.97), patient monitoring and IV access (0.99), disposition (0.98), team communication and dynamics (0.87).
conclusionThe STAT taxonomy demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability between reviewers and can be used to identify AEs in video-recorded trauma resuscitations. These results provide a foundation for adapting video review to objectively quantify and assess AEs in the trauma bay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.