Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37979002›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2023

Advances in radiation therapy for testicular seminoma.

Daniel B Rosen, Arvin Jeremy N Tan, Jennifer Pursley, Sophia C Kamran

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel B RosenHarvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0412-6239
Arvin Jeremy N TanInternal Medicine Residency Program, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Jennifer PursleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0531-6798
Sophia C KamranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. skamran@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-6515
Broad Institute · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Hawaii System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNovel techniques and advances in radiation therapy (RT) have been explored to treat testicular seminoma, a highly radiosensitive and curable histology. We evaluated the historical and current indications for radiation therapy (RT) in testicular seminoma.

methodsA narrative literature review was performed. Studies of RT for testicular seminoma were included. Additionally, recent trials testing the use of combination or surgical therapies for clinical stage (CS) II were included. Search parameters included radiation therapy, testicular seminoma, surgery, and chemoradiation. Parameters and outcomes assessed were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), acute toxicities, long-term sequelae, and rates of secondary malignancies.

resultsPractice defining and changing studies in the use or omission of radiation therapy for testicular seminoma were identified along with resultant changes in National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European guidelines. Recent trials in combined chemoradiation and upfront surgical approaches to CS II disease were reviewed.

conclusionRT has historically been used as adjuvant treatment for CS I disease and is highly effective at treating CS II (A/B) testicular seminoma. The drive to maintain therapeutic efficacy and reduce acute and long-term side effects, namely secondary malignancies, is being tested using new radiation technologies, combined modality therapy in the form of chemoradiation and with upfront surgical approaches. Also, as guidelines now "strongly prefer" surveillance instead of adjuvant RT for CS I disease, the current CS II population comprises patients presenting with CS II disease ("de novo") and those who present with CSII after relapsing post orchiectomy for CS I ("relapsed"). Emerging evidence suggests that these two groups have different outcomes with respect to RT and chemoradiation. Consequently, future trials may need to sub-stratify according to these groups.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Second PrimarySeminomaTesticular NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingOrchiectomyRadiotherapy, AdjuvantProton beam radiationRadiation therapyTesticular seminoma

Identifiers

PMID37979002
OpenAlexW4388794089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.