Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37978494›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2023

Malaria control - lessons learned from trends of Malaria indices over three decades in Karnataka, India.

Vani Hanumantappa Chalageri, Shrinivasa B Marinaik, Sujith N Nath, Richa Singhal, Smita Rawat, Krishnappa Ravikumar, Mahamood Shariff, Alex Eapen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vani Hanumantappa ChalageriICMR - National Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Bengaluru, 562110, Karnataka, India.
Shrinivasa B MarinaikICMR - National Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Bengaluru, 562110, Karnataka, India. drsbm1983@gmail.com.
Sujith N NathICMR - National Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Bengaluru, 562110, Karnataka, India.
Richa SinghalICMR - National Institute of Malaria Research, New Delhi, India.
Smita RawatRegional Office for Health & Family Welfare (ROHFW), Chief Medical Officer, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Krishnappa RavikumarRegional Office for Health & Family Welfare (ROHFW), Ex-Senior Regional Director, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Mahamood ShariffDeputy Director, NCVBDC, Directorate of Health & FW Services, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Alex EapenICMR- National Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Chennai, 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKarnataka is one of the largest states in India and has a wide range of geographical terrains, ecotypes, and prevalence of malaria. It experiences a voluminous influx and efflux of people across the state that affects the spread of malaria. The state deployed focused intervention measures keeping the national objective of malaria elimination as the foremost priority. This brought down malaria cases below a thousand by the year 2021. Furthermore, the state is motivated toward malaria elimination by 2025. This study analyzes the trends in malaria indices over the past three decades in the state and highlights the key intervention measures that impacted the reduction in the malaria burden.

methodsData from 1991 to 2021 at the district level was collected from the archives of Regional Office for Health & Family Welfare (ROH&FW), Bangalore. Time-tend analysis on this data was conducted after categorization into three decades. Sequence plots were then plotted on the moving average of Annual Parasite Index for all those three decades. Generalized estimating equation model with Poisson distribution were used to evaluate difference in these indicators with pre and post interventions like LLIN, RDT with ACT and Guppy and Gambusia fishes.

resultsMalaria burden across the state has consistently declined over the last three decades with few years of exception. This has coincided with the mortality also steadily declining from 2006 and culminating in zero malaria deaths reported from 2011 to 2019. Morbidity had drastically reduced from the hundred-thousand (1993-2003) to ten thousand (2004-2016) thousands (2017-2020) of cases in this period and less than thousand cases were reported by 2021. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) model revealed significant difference of incidence risk ratio of malaria incidence and deaths, post introduction of interventions like LLIN, RDT with ACT and Guppy and Gambusia fishes, indicating these three as important interventions for reducing the malaria burden. Time trend analysis revealed a linear decreasing trend in malaria cases during 2011-2021 decade.

conclusionsA linear decreasing trend in malaria cases was observed during 2011-2021 decade. LLIN, RDT with ACT and Guppy and Gambusia fish's interventions significantly helped in reducing the state malaria burden.

Indexed as

MalariaAnimalsHumansIncidenceIndiaMorbidityPrevalenceAnnual Parasite IndexDecadal trendsMalariaMalaria eliminationP. Falciparum

Identifiers

PMID37978494
PMCPMC10655460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.