Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37978399›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials research2023

Silk fibroin, gelatin, and human placenta extracellular matrix-based composite hydrogels for 3D bioprinting and soft tissue engineering.

Karl Heinrich Schneider, Benjamin J Goldberg, Onur Hasturk, Xuan Mu, Marvin Dötzlhofer, Gabriela Eder, Sophia Theodossiou, Luis Pichelkastner, Peter Riess, Sabrina Rohringer and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A practical toolbox for modelling fibrosis in vitro.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Silk Fibroin Particle-Laden Sponges as a Multiphase Controlled Release Platform.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Natural Regenerative Hydrogels for Wound Healing.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Karl Heinrich SchneiderCenter for Biomedical Research and Translational Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Benjamin J GoldbergDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Onur HasturkDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Xuan MuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Marvin DötzlhoferCenter for Biomedical Research and Translational Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Gabriela EderCenter for Biomedical Research and Translational Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Sophia TheodossiouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Luis PichelkastnerCenter for Biomedical Research and Translational Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Peter RiessCenter for Biomedical Research and Translational Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Sabrina RohringerCenter for Biomedical Research and Translational Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Herbert KissDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Feto-Maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Andreas H Teuschl-WollerDepartment Life Science Technologies, University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien, 1200, Vienna, Austria.
Vincent FitzpatrickDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Marjan EnayatiCenter for Biomedical Research and Translational Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Bruno K PodesserCenter for Biomedical Research and Translational Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Helga BergmeisterCenter for Biomedical Research and Translational Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
David L KaplanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA. David.Kaplan@tufts.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9245-7774
Medical University of Vienna · ATTufts University · USLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Cancer Research · ATBoise State University · USUniversité de Technologie de Compiègne · FRUniversity of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien · AT

Funding

Tufts IRACDAK12GM133314 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI CLAIRE L MOORE, Jamie Lynn Maguire · 2019 to 2026
$8.4M
Austrian Science Fund FWF J 4491NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM133314Österreichische Wissenschaftsfonds (AT) J4491-B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a great clinical need and it remains a challenge to develop artificial soft tissue constructs that can mimic the biomechanical properties and bioactivity of natural tissue. This is partly due to the lack of suitable biomaterials. Hydrogels made from human placenta offer high bioactivity and represent a potential solution to create animal-free 3D bioprinting systems that are both sustainable and acceptable, as placenta is widely considered medical waste. A combination with silk and gelatin polymers can bridge the biomechanical limitations of human placenta chorion extracellular matrix hydrogels (hpcECM) while maintaining their excellent bioactivity.

methodIn this study, silk fibroin (SF) and tyramine-substituted gelatin (G-TA) were enzymatically crosslinked with human placental extracellular matrix (hpcECM) to produce silk-gelatin-ECM composite hydrogels (SGE) with tunable mechanical properties, preserved elasticity, and bioactive functions. The SGE composite hydrogels were characterized in terms of gelation kinetics, protein folding, and bioactivity. The cyto- and biocompatibility of the SGE composite was determined by in vitro cell culture and subcutaneous implantation in a rat model, respectively. The most cell-supportive SGE formulation was then used for 3-dimensional (3D) bioprinting that induced chemical crosslinking during extrusion.

conclusionAddition of G-TA improved the mechanical properties of the SGE composite hydrogels and inhibited crystallization and subsequent stiffening of SF for up to one month. SGE hydrogels exhibit improved and tunable biomechanical properties and high bioactivity for encapsulated cells. In addition, its use as a bioink for 3D bioprinting with free reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels (FRESH) has been validated, opening the possibility to fabricate highly complex scaffolds for artificial soft tissue constructs with natural biomechanics in future.

Identifiers

PMID37978399
PMCPMC10656895
OpenAlexW4388758072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.