ArticleBiology direct2023
Extracellular vesicles derived from different tissues attenuate cardiac dysfunction in murine MI models.
Article in Biology direct, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Small Extracellular Vesicles in Cardioprotection, Cardiac Repair, and Regeneration: Cargo Mechanisms, Producer Cell Sources, and Translational Development.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Extracellular Vesicles as Mediators of Pathophysiology and Disease Progression in Cardiovascular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Tissue-derived extracellular vesicles: comparing Ts-EVs and Te-EVs in extraction, characteristics and research trends.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Extracellular Vesicles in the Heart-Organ Axis: From Inter-Organ Communication to Precision Nanomedicine for Heart Diseases.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Extracellular Vesicles as Emerging Regulators in Ischemic and Hypertrophic Cardiovascular Diseases: A Review of Pathogenesis and Therapeutics.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Review
- Protocol for the isolation and characterization of porcine brain region-associated extracellular particles.PloS one · 2025Article
- Cardioprotection in cardiovascular surgery.Basic research in cardiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExtracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from various cell sources exert cardioprotective effects during cardiac ischemic injury. Our previous study confirmed that EVs derived from ischemic-reperfusion injured heart tissue aggravated cardiac inflammation and dysfunction. However, the role of EVs derived from normal cardiac tissue in myocardial ischemic injury remains elusive.
resultsIn the present study, normal heart-derived EVs (cEVs) and kidney-derived EVs (nEVs) were isolated and intramyocardially injected into mice after myocardial infarction (MI). We demonstrated that administration of both cEVs and nEVs significantly improved cardiac function, reduced the scar size, and alleviated inflammatory infiltration into the heart. In addition, cardiomyocyte apoptosis was inhibited, whereas angiogenesis was enhanced in the hearts receiving cEVs or nEVs treatment. Moreover, intramyocardial injection of cEVs displayed much better cardiac protective efficacy than nEVs in murine MI models. RNA-seq and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis revealed the protective mRNA clusters in both cEVs and nEVs. These mRNAs were involved in multiple signaling pathways, which may synergistically orchestrate to prevent the heart from further damage post MI.
conclusionsCollectively, our results indicated that EVs derived from normal heart tissue may represent a promising strategy for cardiac protection in ischemic heart diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.