Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37978332›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Semantic segmentation of methane plumes with hyperspectral machine learning models.

Vít Růžička, Gonzalo Mateo-Garcia, Luis Gómez-Chova, Anna Vaughan, Luis Guanter, Andrew Markham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Global monitoring of methane point sources using deep learning on hyperspectral radiance measurements from EMIT.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Vít RůžičkaUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK. vit.ruzicka@cs.ox.ac.uk.
Gonzalo Mateo-GarciaTrillium Technologies, London, UK.
Luis Gómez-ChovaUniversity of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Anna VaughanUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Luis GuanterPolytechnic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Andrew MarkhamUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Universitat de València · ESUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversitat Politècnica de València · ESUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

European Space Agency STARCOP I-2022-00380Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2019-109026RB-I00, ERDF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methane is the second most important greenhouse gas contributor to climate change; at the same time its reduction has been denoted as one of the fastest pathways to preventing temperature growth due to its short atmospheric lifetime. In particular, the mitigation of active point-sources associated with the fossil fuel industry has a strong and cost-effective mitigation potential. Detection of methane plumes in remote sensing data is possible, but the existing approaches exhibit high false positive rates and need manual intervention. Machine learning research in this area is limited due to the lack of large real-world annotated datasets. In this work, we are publicly releasing a machine learning ready dataset with manually refined annotation of methane plumes. We present labelled hyperspectral data from the AVIRIS-NG sensor and provide simulated multispectral WorldView-3 views of the same data to allow for model benchmarking across hyperspectral and multispectral sensors. We propose sensor agnostic machine learning architectures, using classical methane enhancement products as input features. Our HyperSTARCOP model outperforms strong matched filter baseline by over 25% in F1 score, while reducing its false positive rate per classified tile by over 41.83%. Additionally, we demonstrate zero-shot generalisation of our trained model on data from the EMIT hyperspectral instrument, despite the differences in the spectral and spatial resolution between the two sensors: in an annotated subset of EMIT images HyperSTARCOP achieves a 40% gain in F1 score over the baseline.

Identifiers

PMID37978332
PMCPMC10656523
OpenAlexW4388764555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.