ArticleScientific reports2023
Biomechanics and finite element analysis of a novel plate designed for posterolateral tibial plateau fractures via the anterolateral approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomechanical performance of proximal tibia fracture plates: A review.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026Review
- Finite element analysis of the influence of fragment size on biomechanical outcomes of various fixation techniques for posterolateral tibial plateau fractures.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical management of posterolateral tibial plateau (PLTP) fractures is challenging. One reason for this challenge is the lack of suitable internal fixation devices. Our aim was to introduce a novel plate via the anterolateral approach for managing PLTP fractures. The biomechanical testing and finite element analysis (FEA) were performed. PLTP fracture models were created using synthetic tibias (n = 10 within each group). These models were randomly assigned to three groups (groups A-C) and fixed with the lateral locking plate, the posterior buttress plate, and the novel plate, respectively. The vertical displacement of the posterolateral fragments was evaluated using biomechanical testing and FEA under axial loads of 250 N, 500 N, and 750 N. We also evaluated the stress distribution and maximum stress of each fracture model using FEA. Biomechanically, under the same loads of 250 N, 500 N, or 750 N, the vertical displacement was significantly different among the three fixation groups (p ≤ 0.001). FEA data indicated that the maximum displacement from group A to C was 3.58 mm, 3.23 mm, and 2.78 mm at 750 N, respectively. The maximum stress from group A to C was 220.88 MPa, 194.63 MPa, and 156.77 MPa in implants, and 62.02 MPa, 77.71 MPa, and 54.15 MPa in bones at 750 N, respectively. The general trends at 250 N and 500 N were consistent with those at 750 N. Based on our biomechanical and FEA results, the novel plate could be a good option for treating PLTP fractures. The novel plate showed stable and reliable features, indicating its suitability for further clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.