Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37978238›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Mock community experiments can inform on the reliability of eDNA metabarcoding data: a case study on marine phytoplankton.

Nadia Marinchel, Alexis Marchesini, Davide Nardi, Matteo Girardi, Silvia Casabianca, Cristiano Vernesi, Antonella Penna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nadia MarinchelDepartment of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Urbino, Urbino, Italy. n.marinchel@campus.uniurb.it.
Alexis MarchesiniResearch Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET), National Research Council (CNR), Porano, Italy.
Davide NardiDAFNAE, University of Padova, Legnaro, PD, Italy.
Matteo GirardiConservation Genomics Research Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, S. Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Silvia CasabiancaDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino, Urbino, Italy.
Cristiano VernesiNational Biodiversity Future Center, Palermo, Italy.
Antonella PennaDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino, Urbino, Italy. antonella.penna@uniurb.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental DNA metabarcoding is increasingly implemented in biodiversity monitoring, including phytoplankton studies. Using 21 mock communities composed of seven unicellular diatom and dinoflagellate algae, assembled with different composition and abundance by controlling the number of cells, we tested the accuracy of an eDNA metabarcoding protocol in reconstructing patterns of alpha and beta diversity. This approach allowed us to directly evaluate both qualitative and quantitative metabarcoding estimates. Our results showed non-negligible rates (17-25%) of false negatives (i.e., failure to detect a taxon in a community where it was included), for three taxa. This led to a statistically significant underestimation of metabarcoding-derived alpha diversity (Wilcoxon p = 0.02), with the detected species richness being lower than expected (based on cell numbers) in 8/21 mock communities. Considering beta diversity, the correlation between metabarcoding-derived and expected community dissimilarities was significant but not strong (R

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, EnvironmentalBiodiversityEnvironmental MonitoringPhytoplanktonReproducibility of ResultsDNA, Environmental

Identifiers

PMID37978238
PMCPMC10656442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.