ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2023
Machine Learning Insights: Predicting Hepatic Encephalopathy After TIPS Placement.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk prediction models for hepatic encephalopathy in patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Risk prediction models for hepatic encephalopathy following TIPS: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Prediction of Post-TIPS Outcomes: Integrating Clinical, Biochemical, and Radiomics Data-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Machine learning techniques in hepatic encephalopathy: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Risk factors for hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in cirrhotic patients: A comprehensive minireview.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Optimal threshold of portal pressure gradient for patients with ascites after covered TIPS: a multicentre cohort study.Hepatology international · 2025Article
- Can Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Transform Prediction and Treatment of Post-Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy?Gastro hep advances · 2025Article
- Hepatic encephalopathy post-TIPS: Current status and prospects in predictive assessment.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop and assess machine learning (ML) models' ability to predict post-procedural hepatic encephalopathy (HE) following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, 327 patients who underwent TIPS for hepatic cirrhosis between 2005 and 2019 were analyzed. Thirty features (8 clinical, 10 laboratory, 12 procedural) were collected, and HE development regardless of severity was recorded one month follow-up. Univariate statistical analysis was performed with numeric and categoric data, as appropriate. Feature selection is used with a sequential feature selection model with fivefold cross-validation (CV). Three ML models were developed using support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR) and CatBoost, algorithms. Performances were evaluated with nested fivefold-CV technique.
resultsPost-procedural HE was observed in 105 (32%) patients. Patients with variceal bleeding (p = 0.008) and high post-porto-systemic pressure gradient (p = 0.004) had a significantly increased likelihood of developing HE. Also, patients having only one indication of bleeding or ascites were significantly unlikely to develop HE as well as Budd-Chiari disease (p = 0.03). The feature selection algorithm selected 7 features. Accuracy ratios for the SVM, LR and CatBoost, models were 74%, 75%, and 73%, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.82, 0.83, and 0.83, respectively.
conclusionML models can aid identifying patients at risk of developing HE after TIPS placement, providing an additional tool for patient selection and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37978062What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.