Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37978062›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2023

Machine Learning Insights: Predicting Hepatic Encephalopathy After TIPS Placement.

Okan İnce, Hakan Önder, Mehmet Gençtürk, Jafar Golzarian, Shamar Young

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Machine learning techniques in hepatic encephalopathy: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Okan İnceDepartment of Radiology, Medical School, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. okan_ince@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5083-5490
Hakan ÖnderDepartment of Radiology, Prof. Dr. Cemil TASCIOGLU City Hospital, Health Sciences University, Kaptanpaşa Mah, Daruleceze Cad. No: 25 Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğlu Şehir Hastanesi, Radyoloji Kliniği, 34384, Şişli, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet GençtürkDepartment of Radiology, Medical School, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Jafar GolzarianDepartment of Radiology, Medical School, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Shamar YoungDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and assess machine learning (ML) models' ability to predict post-procedural hepatic encephalopathy (HE) following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective study, 327 patients who underwent TIPS for hepatic cirrhosis between 2005 and 2019 were analyzed. Thirty features (8 clinical, 10 laboratory, 12 procedural) were collected, and HE development regardless of severity was recorded one month follow-up. Univariate statistical analysis was performed with numeric and categoric data, as appropriate. Feature selection is used with a sequential feature selection model with fivefold cross-validation (CV). Three ML models were developed using support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR) and CatBoost, algorithms. Performances were evaluated with nested fivefold-CV technique.

resultsPost-procedural HE was observed in 105 (32%) patients. Patients with variceal bleeding (p = 0.008) and high post-porto-systemic pressure gradient (p = 0.004) had a significantly increased likelihood of developing HE. Also, patients having only one indication of bleeding or ascites were significantly unlikely to develop HE as well as Budd-Chiari disease (p = 0.03). The feature selection algorithm selected 7 features. Accuracy ratios for the SVM, LR and CatBoost, models were 74%, 75%, and 73%, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.82, 0.83, and 0.83, respectively.

conclusionML models can aid identifying patients at risk of developing HE after TIPS placement, providing an additional tool for patient selection and management.

Indexed as

Esophageal and Gastric VaricesHepatic EncephalopathyHypertension, PortalPortasystemic Shunt, Transjugular IntrahepaticGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansLiver CirrhosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHepatic encephalopathyMachine learningPortosystemic shuntTransjugular

Identifiers

PMID37978062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.