Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37978060›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Predictors of cancer patients' utilization of psychooncological support: Examining patient´s attitude and physician´s recommendation.

Ute Goerling, Christian Albus, Corinna Bergelt, Yesim Erim, Hermann Faller, Franziska Geiser, Klaus Hönig, Beate Hornemann, Imad Maatouk, Barbara Stein and 3 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Predictors of the use of psycho-oncological care.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ute GoerlingCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. ute.goerling@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8157-3836
Christian AlbusDepartment of Psychosomatic and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty and University Clinic, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Corinna BergeltInstitute of Medical Psychology, Greifswald University Medicine, Greifswald, Germany.
Yesim ErimDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Hermann FallerDepartment of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Franziska GeiserDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, University Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Klaus HönigDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Ulm University Clinic, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm (CCCU), Ulm, Germany.
Beate HornemannComprehensive Cancer Center, University Clinic Centre Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Imad MaatoukDivision of Medical Psychosomatics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Barbara SteinDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Paracelsus Medical University, General Hospital Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
Martin TeufelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Comprehensive Cancer Center Essen (WTZ) and LVR Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Martin WickertComprehensive Cancer Centre, University Clinic Centre Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Joachim WeisComprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Self-Help Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with cancer suffer from a wide range of psychological distress. Nevertheless, in the literature low utilization rates of psychooncological services are reported. Various factors may influence the utilization of professional support during inpatient care. Up to now it is unclear to what extent patients' attitude towards psychooncological support and physicians' recommendation for psychooncological care may influence the utilization.

methodsIn a multicenter longitudinal observational study in Comprehensive Cancer Centers Germany, 1398 patients with mixed cancer diagnoses were assessed at baseline during their hospital stay with respect to psychooncological distress and the need for and use of psychooncological services.

resultsPsychooncological support was used by almost 28.4% of patients up to this time. A positive attitude towards psychooncological support was reported by 41.6%. A recommendation of psychooncological support by a physician was received by 16.2%. These patients reported a significant higher level of distress compared to patients who did not received a recommendation. Multivariable logistic regression detected that the utilization rate was 3.79 times higher among patients with positive attitude towards psychooncological support (OR, 3.79; 95% CI 2.51-5.73, p < 0.001). Utilization was 4.21 times more likely among patients who received a physician´s recommendation (OR, 4.21; 95% CI 2.98-5.95, p < 0.001).

conclusionThe results of the study provide evidence of the relevance of giving more attention to psychooncological distress and attitudes towards psychooncological care. To reduce reservations, patients need low-threshold information about the psychooncological services offered.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPhysiciansAnxietyHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatientsAttitudeCancerPhysician´s recommendationPsychooncological supportUtilization

Identifiers

PMID37978060
PMCPMC10725332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.